Subscribe

Two Pimco offerings dragged down in rout

The recent bond market sell-off has left shares of two of Pacific Investment Management Co. LLC’s closed-end funds…

The recent bond market sell-off has left shares of two of Pacific Investment Management Co. LLC’s closed-end funds trading at fire sale prices.

Closed-end funds have a fixed number of shares outstanding. Therefore, when a fund is popular, the shares tend to trade at a premium to net asset value. When they are unpopular, they trade at a discount.

With investor sentiment turning away from bond funds, which have seen six straight weeks of outflows, shares of the $282 million Pimco Income Strategy Fund (PFL) and the $587 million Pimco Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) are trading at their biggest discounts in three years.

The drop in price could signal a good buying opportunity for income-hungry investors, wrote Cara Esser, a closed-end fund analyst at Morningstar Inc.

Shares of the Pimco Income Strategy Fund are trading at a 2.5% discount to the fund’s net asset value and shares of Pimco Income Strategy Fund II are trading at a 2% discount. Over the past three years, the funds’ shares have traded at premiums of 6.4% and 4%, respectively, according to Morningstar.

Both funds have a distribution rate of more than 9%.

Bond guru Bill Gross was named manager of the funds in mid-2009 and shortly thereafter, the funds’ mandates were expanded to be more flexible. Since the funds adopted a go-anywhere approach in early 2010, their performance had been on a tear.

The Pimco Income Strategy Funds had annualized three-year returns of around 16% as of July 8, according to Morningstar.

The funds’ closed-end peers had an average three-year annualized return of 12% over the same time. The average open-end fund had gained 7%.

One of the reasons for the supersized performance is that Pimco isn’t afraid to use leverage to boost returns.

Both funds have more than 20% leverage, which may scare off some investors, according to Morningstar.

“Pimco’s extensive use of leverage and derivatives in the past indicates a willingness to put capital at risk for potentially improved total return,” Ms. Esser wrote. “These funds are not for the faint of heart.”

[email protected] Twitter: @jasonkephart

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Advisers betting heavily on Europe’s growth

The eurozone is finally starting to show signs of growth more than five years after the financial crisis, and financial advisers are betting that there is more good news to come.

Reallocation gives pop to Edward Jones’ first fund launch

New offering grabs $2.8 billion in first few days; a JPMorgan fund has similar outflow.

Muni market beware: Puerto Rico running out of time

If the commonwealth defaults, it will cause a shock to the system.

Guess who’s picking up the cash that’s flowed out of Pimco

BlackRock and Goldman Sachs are the big beneficiaries of Pimco's bad bond call.

Why active equity managers should be scared of Gundlach, Gross

Both Bill Gross' Pimco and Jeffrey Gundlach's DoubleLine Capital have made pushes into actively managed equities in the last three or so years, and if active managers aren't worried yet, they should be.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print