Subscribe

What kinds of income enable you to deduct IRA contributions?

A recent Tax Court case shows which of your checks don't count as compensation.

A recent tax case highlights the confusion over what counts as compensation for contributing to an individual retirement account.

In the case (Alex Halo v. Commissioner; T.C. Summ. Op. 2014-92; No. 23774-12S, Sept. 11, 2014), the court ruled that Alex Halo did not have qualifying compensation, or earned income, and denied a $3,000 deduction for his 2010 IRA contribution. Mr. Halo was unemployed for all of 2010, receiving only unemployment compensation, interest income and Social Security benefits.

To qualify for an IRA contribution, an individual must have compensation, which is generally earned income, including wages or self-employment income. The court ruled that unemployment payments and Social Security benefits do not qualify as compensation for making an IRA contribution.

Mr. Halo lost his case, and his IRA deduction was disallowed.

Even though it counts as taxable income and contains the word “compensation,” unemployment compensation is not considered such for IRA contribution eligibility.

But you would have to dig deep to find exactly where it says that — all the way to a little-known IRS proposed regulation issued in 1981 [(Prop. Reg. Section 1.219(a)-1(b)(3)].

SOCIAL SECURITY

Social Security benefits are another area of confusion.

While the benefits are earned and paid for, the Halo case reminds us they do not qualify as compensation for IRA contribution eligibility.

According to tax code section 86(f)(3), Social Security benefits are treated as an “amount received as a pension or annuity,” and such income does not qualify for IRA contribution eligibility.

The court ruled that Mr. Halo was not entitled to a deduction for a contribution to his IRA, because that is what the IRS challenged.

In fact, he was not even eligible to make it. To contribute to either a traditional IRA or a Roth IRA, a person much have compensation, and Mr. Halo didn’t have any.

When a person has no compensation or less compensation than his or her total IRA and Roth IRA contributions during the applicable year, the contribution results in an excess contribution. Such contributions are subject to a 6% excise tax for each year they remain in the account.

In a related case in 2011 [Robert Kobell v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2011-66; March 17, 2011), Robert Kobell claimed he was a professional stock trader and that his trading income should count as compensation for making an IRA contribution.

The Tax Court ruled that Mr. Kobell did not qualify as a professional trader. Therefore, the income from his investments was not earned income, and he could not take a deduction for a contribution to his IRA.

In stating that he was clearly not a professional trader, the court pointed out that he met none of the general guidelines. He had three stock transactions all year and no customers.

PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD

What kinds of compensation qualify for an IRA contribution.

It is generally straightforward. For most clients, earned income comes from employment — either as a worker at a business or as a self-employed person.

The safe harbor is an amount shown in box 1 of Form W-2.

Sometimes, however, what counts as compensation is not so clear cut.

For instance, many clients (and even many advisers) fail to recognize that alimony and maintenance payments represent earned income.

Such clients can contribute to traditional and Roth IRAs even if they do not work and have no other source of income.

Another thing for advisers to consider is that clients with qualifying compensation (such as wages or alimony) must meet other criteria to be eligible to put money into an IRA.

AGE LIMIT

For example, contributions to a traditional IRA cannot be made beginning the year in which a person turns 701/2.

Though there is no such age restriction with a Roth IRA, contributions are not allowed once earned income exceeds certain limits.

For 2014, those limits are $191,000 for married-filing-jointly taxpayers and $129,000 for single taxpayers.

Ed Slott, a certified public accountant, created the IRA Leadership Program and Ed Slott’s Elite IRA Advisor Group. He can be reached at irahelp.com.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Once again, IRS waives RMDs for beneficiaries subject to the 10-year rule

The new relief on required minimum distributions for this year builds on previous IRS relief for RMDs in 2021, 2022 and 2023.

James Caan estate case highlights rollover rules advisors need to know

An offer the IRS refused! The estate owes nearly $1 million in taxes and penalties.

An unexpected double tax break for 529-to-Roth rollovers

There’s a chance to do two 529-to-Roth rollovers this year – but only if the first one (for 2023) is done by April 15.

High stock values and layoffs combine for big tax breaks on company stock

With the net unrealized appreciation tax break, company stock can be withdrawn from a 401(k) in a lump-sum distribution and have its appreciation taxed at capital gains rates, rather than as ordinary income.

Planning for the largest IRA balances ever in 2024  

Here are tactics to use this year given the opportunities for record stock values at the end of 2023.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print