Mary Beth Franklin

Retirement 2.0blog

Mary Beth Franklin on what your clients really want when they talk about retirement.

Social Security's rearview mirror: Retroactive benefits

Claiming benefits earned in the past boosts couple's income now and later

Dec 9, 2013 @ 12:07 pm

By Mary Beth Franklin

+ Zoom

Sometimes I feel like a proud parent watching a child take his first steps as I help financial advisers understand the basic rules of Social Security. Other times, I'm wowed by the brilliance of my star pupils who have learned the nuances of sophisticated claiming strategies and have applied them in the most effective way to help their clients.

I received an e-mail recently from two such star pupils, Nancy Woodall and her colleague John Kerns. Both are advisers with Meridian Investment Counsel Inc. in San Leandro, Calif. The two advisers asked my opinion on how to maximize Social Security benefits for their clients, a married couple where each spouse had turned 66 in January 2013.

Ms. Woodall and Mr. Kerns realized that their clients had reached full retirement age, when it is possible to exercise creative claiming strategies to maximize Social Security benefits. The advisers said their clients are both in good health, have a family history of longevity on both sides and have sufficient financial resources to allow them to delay claiming benefits.

The advisers told me that the husband, Paul, is entitled to Social Security benefits of about $2,500 per month now and nearly $3,400 per month if he delays collecting until 70. The wife, Jane, was eligible for her own Social Security retirement benefit of about $650 per month when she turned 66 and about $870 per month if she waited until 70.

Given the fact that Jane's own retirement benefit of $650 per month is worth substantially less than her spousal benefit of $1,250, it wouldn't make sense for her to delay collecting benefits until age 70, Ms. Woodall said. It would be better for her to claim spousal benefits as soon as possible.

I agreed.

Ms.Woodall and Mr. Kerns also reasoned that it probably would make sense for the husband to file and suspend in order to trigger higher spousal benefits for his wife while he delayed collecting his own benefits until they were worth more.

I concurred.

But nearly a year had passed since both spouses had reached their full retirement age. They knew that an individual who is older than full retirement age when he or she makes a claim can request a lump sum payment of up to six months of retroactive benefits, beginning with the month they reached full retirement age.

But the advisers wondered if it were possible for the husband to file a retroactive claim to file and suspend his benefits in order to trigger spousal benefits for his wife.

I wasn't sure, so I asked the all-knowing staff at the Social Security Administration's national press office in Baltimore. They didn't disappoint me.

“The husband can file for retirement benefits retroactively going back six months,” Social Security spokeswoman Kia Anderson said in an e-mail. “Once he files for retroactive retirement benefits, he can voluntarily suspend his benefit during any period beginning with the first month of entitlement,” she added.

That's great news, but it gets even better.

“The wife could then apply for retirement benefits retroactively going back to the worker's first month of entitlement,” Ms. Anderson explained.

The advisers were delighted with the news. This is what it will means for their very happy clients.

The husband, Paul, will file and suspend and make that election retroactive to six months ago, Ms. Woodall told me. Paul will collect nothing until he reaches age 70.

In the interim, Paul will earn delayed retirement credits worth 8% per year for every year he postpones claiming benefits. That will boost his basic benefit by 32% to $3,388 per month, plus intervening cost-of-living adjustments.

The wife, Jane, will file for Social Security benefits and receive six months of retroactive spousal benefits (about $7,500 based on half of Paul's full retirement age amount). That's nearly double what Jane would have gotten if she filed retroactively for her own retirement benefit.

“This strategy preserves Paul's full benefit at age 70 (132% of his full retirement age benefit) and gets the couple the largest cumulative joint-life benefit,” Ms. Woodall wrote.

She said her colleague, Mr. Kerns, plans to accompany the clients on their visit to the Social Security office and promises to keep me updated on the outcome.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Oct 17

Conference

Best Practices Workshop

For the fifth year, InvestmentNews will host the Best Practices Workshop & Awards, bringing together the industry’s top-performing and most influential firms in one room for a full-day. This exclusive workshop and awards program for the... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Stephanie Bogan: How financial advisers can achieve more by reframing their realities

By revaluating the choices they make and the outcomes that result from them, financial advisers can make sure they're properly serving those most important to them — their clients, according to Stephanie Bogan, founder of Educe Inc.

Latest news & opinion

Sean Spicer resigns as press secretary after Anthony Scaramucci is appointed communications director

Scaramucci is known as an ardent foe of the DOL fiduciary rule, having said during the campaign that Trump would repeal it .

Redoing the math on a 4% retirement withdrawal rate

Given the current interest-rate environment and other factors, advisers disagree about whether the number is too conservative or not conservative enough.

House panel passes bill to replace DOL fiduciary rule with one requiring disclosure of conflicts

Measure likely to continue in partisan advance in House, but could stall in Senate.

Morgan Stanley says recruiting and attrition have slowed down

If wirehouses can successfully reduce their reliance on signing bonuses to recruit brokers, they could increase profits.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print