Drop in jobless claims pulls taper off the table but raises conundrum for the Fed

Unemployment rate could drop to Fed's trigger level – but it's a phantom rate

Jan 10, 2014 @ 1:53 pm

By Jeff Benjamin

Economists and market strategists are generally brushing off Friday's surprisingly dismal employment report as weather related, which is giving the financial markets a reason to look elsewhere for areas of concern.

But it is difficult to completely ignore the fact that nonfarm payrolls rose by just 74,000 in December, when the consensus estimate was expecting close to 200,000 new jobs. Meanwhile, the nation's unemployment rate magically fell to 6.7% from 7%, which should be raising some eyebrows.

The December data, the worst monthly jobs report in nearly three years, at the very least takes another round of Fed tapering off the table, according to Paul Zemsky, chief investment officer of multiasset strategies at ING U.S. Investment Management.

“This kind of employment data will put a cap, at least for now, on any further tapering by the Fed, and that should give the market a bit of comfort,” he said.

Perhaps the biggest concern is the way the weak jobs market is driving down the unemployment rate, which could introduce a new riddle for the Federal Reserve to try to solve, or at least manage.

As has largely been the case throughout this economic recovery, the unemployment rate has been dropping as the result of more people dropping out of the workforce.

The December reports shows that the percentage of the workforce actively looking for work fell to its lowest level in 36 years by dropping to 62.8%, from 63%.

“The unemployment rate is dropping, but unfortunately it's dropping for the wrong reasons,” Mr. Zemsky said. “People are just giving up.”

One of the problems with a theoretical 6.7% unemployment rate is that it is getting dangerously close to the 6.5% rate that the Fed has set as a target range for adjusting interest rates. One would have to assume the Fed understands that the unemployment rate isn't really 6.7%, but if it keeps dropping, it does have the potential to create some awkward moments.

“Unfortunately, we're now at a crossroads in many ways,” said Wilmer Stith, co-manager of the Wilmington Broad Market Bond Fund.

“In the Fed's last statement they said they need inflation to be well above the current 1% rate to something in the 2.5% range, but they also said they want the unemployment rate to be in the area of 6.5%,” Mr. Stith said.

As he sees it, if Congress doesn't act to extend unemployment benefits further, the officially reported unemployment rate will continue to fall, potentially putting the Fed in a corner.

With long-term unemployment already accounting for nearly 38% of the unemployed, the trend is something that should not be overlooked or even sugar-coated by a shrinking unemployment rate.

“Ultimately, this means the responsibility of paying taxes is falling on fewer and fewer people,” Mr. Stith said. “None of this paints a longer-term rosy picture.”

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

What's the top issue on advisers minds?

Laura Pierson from Carson Group discusses how the old topic of 'Human Capital' is hot again because of millennials.

Latest news & opinion

New ways to pay for college

Experts respond to real-life scenarios of people struggling to afford higher education.

How technology is reshaping the advice business

Artificial intelligence, Amazon and robo-advisers are some of the topics on the minds of tech experts.

Best- and worst-performing sector funds and ETFs this year

A rising tide may lift all ships, but a bull market doesn't lift all stock sectors. Here are the best- and worst-performing sectors this year, with the top and bottom fund in each sector.

Betterment slapped with $400,000 fine from Finra

Robo-adviser cited for violating customer protection rule and not maintaining its books and records correctly.

Supreme Court ruling on SEC judges unlikely to upend advice industry

But it could give rise to new hearings for some advisers who are already in litigation with the agency such as Dawn Bennett.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print