Subscribe

Would you pay 8% in fees for an illiquid alternatives fund?

The fees with Blackstone Group's nontraded fund of hedge funds make 2 and 20 not so bad. Are the returns strong enough to justify the stiff cost structure?

If the thought of paying the classic “two and 20” to a hedge fund makes you queasy, you may want to look away.
Private-equity giant Blackstone Group is soliciting new shares for its $300 million Blackstone Alternative Alpha Fund, which carries a price tag that makes 2% in annual fees and 20% of profits look like a clearance sale. The nontraded fund of hedge funds has all-in annual costs of 8.28%, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
That includes Blackstone’s 1.25% management fee, 2.18% of “other” expenses such as investor servicing and custody fees, an ongoing 0.85% distribution fee, and 5.83% of underlying fund fees. That all adds up to more than 10% in fees, but Blackstone has agreed to waive 1.83 percentage points of them.
The average liquid multialternatives fund charges 1.56%, according to Morningstar Inc.
On top of the Alternative Alpha Fund’s expense ratio, there is also a 3% sales load and a 2% redemption fee if shares are sold within 12 months of purchase. The fund could therefore cost upwards of 13%, if the shares are sold before one year ended.
It’s not that easy to sell shares though. The fund only repurchases shares periodically.
So what do you get for 8% of assets annually and limited liquidity?
A fund of 19 different hedge funds chosen by Blackstone, including 12 long/short equity managers, two global macro managers, two multimanager managers, one managed-futures fund, one credit-driven fund and one event-driven fund. Of course, that mix is subject to change at any time.
The fund has manage to outperform despite its expense-laden head winds. From its launch in April 2012 to the end of last September, the fund gained more than 11%, according to its most recent semiannual report. The Morningstar MSCI Composite AW Hedge Fund Index, an asset-weighted composite of nearly 1,000 hedge funds, had a return of just 5.35% over the same time period.
Still, that doesn’t answer the question of whether you get what you pay for.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Advisers betting heavily on Europe’s growth

The eurozone is finally starting to show signs of growth more than five years after the financial crisis, and financial advisers are betting that there is more good news to come.

Reallocation gives pop to Edward Jones’ first fund launch

New offering grabs $2.8 billion in first few days; a JPMorgan fund has similar outflow.

Muni market beware: Puerto Rico running out of time

If the commonwealth defaults, it will cause a shock to the system.

Guess who’s picking up the cash that’s flowed out of Pimco

BlackRock and Goldman Sachs are the big beneficiaries of Pimco's bad bond call.

Why active equity managers should be scared of Gundlach, Gross

Both Bill Gross' Pimco and Jeffrey Gundlach's DoubleLine Capital have made pushes into actively managed equities in the last three or so years, and if active managers aren't worried yet, they should be.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print