AdvisorShares ETF sees rising assets in sinking floats

Jan 28, 2014 @ 3:43 pm

By Jeff Benjamin

On paper, the AdvisorShares Trim Tabs Float Shrink ETF (TTFS) looks like the perfect means of tapping into the supply-and-demand fundamentals of the stock market.

And based on last year's 42.4% gain, it would appear the 27-month-old, $105 million ETF is actually on to something.

The basic concept is to invest in companies that are seeing their available freely-tradable float shrink. The float is typically calculated by subtracting restricted stock from the total outstanding stock.

It is possible for the float to be shrinking while the outstanding shares are increasing.

As portfolio manager Minyi Chen of Trim Tabs Asset Management explains, there are actually three major quantitative screens involved in building the portfolio of 100 equal-weighted stocks.

The research looks at the float and pace of change in that float, free cash flow, and leverage levels. But, ultimately, it is really about the float, and that principal of supply and demand.

“This is information that is not widely used,” said Mr. Chen. “Fundamentally, it just makes sense.”

It certainly has made sense for the past few years, including a 14% gain in 2012. But it is worth noting that the strategy is riding a well-timed wave of shrinking equity float.

By Mr. Chen's own calculations, the broad equity market tends to rally during periods of shrinking equity float, which has been the case since March 2010.

During periods of increasing equity float, the broad market tends to see increased volatility and periods of decline.

To that, Mr. Chen responds that since he is always investing in the 100 companies in the Russell 3000 Index with the fastest-shrinking floats, there will always be companies that fit inside the portfolio.

Some of the key driving forces behind shrinking float include company stock repurchase programs and insider buying.

A reverse stock split, while technically defined as reduced float, will not qualify a company for the portfolio, according to Mr. Chen, because reverse splits are almost always a negative indicator.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video


The #MeToo movement and the financial advice industry

Attendees at the Women to Watch luncheon commend the #MeToo movement for raising awareness about the issue of sexual harassment and bringing women together.

Latest news & opinion

What the next market downturn means for small RIAs

Firms that have enjoyed AUM growth because of the runup in stocks may find it hard to adjust to declining revenues if the market suffers a major correction.

DOL fiduciary rule likely to live on despite appeals court loss

Future developments will hinge on whether the Labor Department continues the fight to remake the regulation its own way.

DOL fiduciary rule: Industry reacts to Fifth Circuit ruling

Groups on both sides of the fiduciary debate had plenty to say.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacates DOL fiduciary rule

In split decision, judges say agency exceeded authority.

UBS, after dumping the broker protocol, continues to see brokers come and go

The wirehouse has seen 14 individuals or teams leave and five join for a net loss of $2.4 billion in AUM


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print