Did January set the tone for 2014?

2014 is likely to be bumpier than 2013, with clients likely to need more hand-holding from advisers, meaning it isn't too early to begin.

Feb 2, 2014 @ 12:01 am

Many investors were spoiled by the stock market returns of last year, so the rough start for 2014 might have caused some unease that financial advisers should address with clients, some of whom likely remember the old adage: “As goes January, so goes the year.”

At the very least, the rocky start gives advisers an opportunity to touch base with clients and address any concerns they might have.

With the market down more than 3% for the month of Janary, investors might be thinking that it is time to take some profits before a correction takes away all or most of the gains from last year. Despite the January decline, the S&P 500 is still up more than 18% for the 12-month period.


A temporary correction isn't unexpected. Last year, the stock market, as measured by the S&P 500, delivered a return — including dividends — of more than 30%, while corporate earnings, when final figures are tallied, likely grew by only about 7.5% and the economy by only about 2%.

This implies rapid expansion of the price-earnings ratio.

By Yale University professor Robert Shiller's cyclically adjusted calculation, which averages profits over 10 years, the P/E for the market at the end of the year was 25.4, well above the historical average.

The ratio can move back toward the average through a market correction, by stock prices increasing more slowly than corporate earnings or by more-rapid earnings growth. The last would be preferred.

Perhaps investors were calculating their P/Es based on estimated 2014 earnings, which would lower the ratio if they expected those earnings to be higher than those of 2013, but many analysts have been reducing their 2014 earnings estimates.

As noted in a previous editorial, a year of strong market gains more often than not has been followed by another year of gains, though of much smaller magnitude, so a down year won't necessarily follow 2013's strong market.

But this year is likely to be bumpier than 2013, with the Federal Reserve having embarked on tapering its bond purchases, and China and some emerging markets showing some economic weakness.

Clients are likely to need more hand-holding from advisers, and it isn't too soon to begin.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Crossmark's Rentfrow: Why should advisors care about responsible investing?

There are lot of misconceptions when it comes to socially responsible investing. Crossmark's David Rentfrow debunks the myths and discusses opportunities for advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Meet our 2017 Women to Watch

Introducing 20 female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders, advancing the business of providing advice through their creativity and hard work.

Raymond James executives call on industry to keep broker protocol

Also ask firms to pay for the administration of the protocol to 'ensure its longevity and relevance.'

Senate committee approves tax plan but full passage not assured

Several Republican senators expressed reservations about the bill, and the GOP cannot afford too many defections.

House passes tax bill, focus turns to Senate

Tax reform legislation expected to have more of a challenge in upper chamber.

SEC enforcement of advisers drops in Trump era

The agency pursued 82 cases against advisers and firms in fiscal year 2017, down from 98 the previous year.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print