Investment Strategies

The global bond market's potential

Investors who shy away from fixed income because of rising-rate fears are missing opportunities

Feb 16, 2014 @ 12:01 am

By Jason Brady

fixed income, bonds, global bond market
+ Zoom

Many market participants and strategists recently have predicted higher “risk-free” rates, particularly in U.S. Treasuries, for this year.

Last year, the yield on 10-year Treasuries rose to 3.03%, from 1.76%. The resulting price action caused losses in those bonds and in many high-quality fixed-income securities.

The Barclays Aggregate Bond Index lost about 2% of value on the year. Because most investors think what will happen in the coming year is exactly the same as what just happened (which is usually not the case), many forecast losses for higher-quality fixed income into 2014 and beyond.

Although compared with market consensus, I am much more nervous about the global economic picture, I agree that a period of historically low interest rates isn't the best time to invest in securities such as U.S. Treasuries. But investors who shy away from the bond markets entirely are missing a large and growing number of opportunities.

Many subsectors within the fixed-income market have very little correlation to U.S. Treasuries, and historically, some even exhibit negative correlation. Over the past decade, U.S. high-yield bonds typically have moved higher in price when U.S. Treasuries have moved lower.

This is largely due to the credit risk inherent in high yield. These bonds promise more yield due to the significant uncertainly surrounding prospects for investors' being repaid principal and interest.

When broader economic conditions improve, two things happen: 1) Investors grow less interested in the safety of U.S. Treasuries, which results in higher yields and lower prices of those securities, and 2) Investors become less nervous about the credit risk inherent in high yield, which can lead to higher prices of those bonds.


But high-yield bonds aren't the only sub-asset class that can provide decent returns, even during a period of rising rates. Various parts of the asset- and mortgage-backed-securities markets can still provide acceptable, even good, returns as rates rise.

Although investors fixate on the single metric of duration, they tend to miss the fact that for many securities, a simple duration figure doesn't fully reflect either the risk or the potential return.

But a much larger or more robust debt universe isn't unequivocally good. The tremendous growth of the subprime-mortgage market in the middle of the last decade didn't end well.

The recent explosion of the bank loan market (which wasn't tracked by Lehman/Barclays at all prior to 2006) is frightening. Investors are ignoring significant credit risks in bank loans and terrible negative optionality — due to those instruments' callability — for the false sense of safety that comes with having very little exposure to rising U.S. Treasury rates (bank loans are generally packaged as floating-rate securities).


A much larger debt market for an economy that is unchanged in size can mean that less and less debt is held by banks and more is directly held by investors. This is positive and is one reason that the United States has experienced a better recovery from the global financial crisis than Europe.

However, ever-expanding debt markets without fundamental support from a growing economy ultimately indicate an over-reliance on credit growth for economic expansion, which is clearly unsustainable. In any event, today's larger and more diverse marketplace means that investors should spend much more time examining the nature of the risks that they assume when investing across sub-asset classes and across the world.

Debt markets have changed and grown dramatically over the course of the past decade. Thinking of U.S. Treasuries and their attendant risks as somehow representative of the global bond market is as limiting and foolish as equating the Dow Jones Industrial Average to the global stock market.

Although U.S. Treasury rates are low — and certain other sub-asset classes within fixed income look too hot for comfort — investors should be aware of the diversity of risks and opportunities available, and calibrate investment strategies accordingly.

Jason Brady is a portfolio manager and managing director at Thornburg Investment Management Inc.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Sep 26


Investing 2017: Industry at a Crossroads

The advice industry is at a unique inflection point, as the way clients are investing has changed dramatically: Technology has evolved, access to innovative products has changed, and the active vs. passive debate continues to rage on. Advisers... Learn more

Featured video


Pershing's Dolly: Lessons in leadership

Women are holding top leadership roles as CEOs of some of the industry’s top firms, but it’s still the exception rather than the norm. Lisa Dolly of Pershing talks about how to balance it all.

Latest news & opinion

More advisers disapprove of Trump job performance at six-month mark

More than half of respondents to InvestmentNews poll say their confidence has dropped since start of term. Supporters give him partial credit for market uptick.

Fidelity taps Goldman Sachs to expand lending services through RIAs

Streamlined non-purpose loans use investment portfolios as collateral.

Jay Clayton says SEC, DOL can give market 'clarity' on fiduciary rule

Chief regulator is confident two agencies could reach 'common ground' on an investment advice standard across all accounts.

Sen. Gary Peters brings broker background to work every day on Capitol Hill

Michigan Democrat resists ripping up DOL fiduciary rule but would be open to some changes.

DOL fiduciary rule causing DC-plan record keepers to change business with insurance agents

Principal has communicated that independent agents must change their business models to keep receiving compensation.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print