It's a stock pickers' game in emerging markets

If you're OK with volatility and want emerging-markets exposure, you need to pick your spots carefully

Feb 25, 2014 @ 12:01 am

By Cindy Sweeting

Emerging markets had a generally rough time in 2013 and that bearish mood continued into the first month of 2014. The underperformance of emerging-markets equities versus those in the developed world last year was actually the worst since the Asian financial crisis in 1998.

In our view, the main issues affecting emerging markets are threefold:

First, the Federal Reserve's pulling back or “tapering” of the asset purchase program known as quantitative easing has been elevating financing costs and spurring some capital outflows.

Second, there's fear of a slowing in China's growth rate.

Third, the rapid credit expansion in several emerging markets has posed some risks to financial stability.

Of these, probably the most attention has been focused on the uncertainties surrounding Fed policy, but in our view, local risks in individual markets could be just as important.


The relatively good news is that the emerging markets don't appear to be getting hit indiscriminantly at this stage. Those faring the worst have had a higher dependency on foreign financing, and within this most vulnerable group, those with large current account deficits are bearing the brunt of recent selling pressure.

As such, we see a fair degree of divergence in performance. Some economies are more vulnerable than others. In our view, the recent underperformance of emerging-markets equities probably reflects mainly a growing realization that the slowdown in the largest emerging economies — China, Brazil and India — is as much structural as it is cyclical.

A number of emerging markets are looking pretty attractive to us right now versus their 10-year averages. However, we think absolute price-to-earnings ratios are not as attractive. It is important to remember that many of the tail winds of the last decade, including very strong earnings and economic growth, have receded, and head winds are rising. So while P-Es may seem low, earnings in general are still near peak levels and forward estimates may be too high, per our estimates.

Our analysis indicates that, in general, emerging markets are not excessively undervalued, so bottom-up analysis when it comes to individual stock selection is critical.


South Korea has been a good hunting ground for us in terms of unearthing bargains at the stock level. South Korea's export competitiveness was undercut by yen weakness in 2013, but reduced competition between Korean and Japanese exports since 2008 has been an offset. We've seen a number of South Korean companies overshadow their Asian peers, including those in Japan. For example, South Korean auto firms are more sensitive to currency fluctuations, but they have made strides and now produce significant output overseas. They also target different buyers from Japanese auto makers. South Korean car exports were at a monthly record high in the fourth quarter of 2013, with the U.S. and China being the primary major end-markets.

To its credit, South Korea appears to be focusing on structural economic initiatives rather than trying to weaken its currency to gain a competitive edge. It initiated some deregulation, outlined more financial support for small- and medium-sized enterprises and startups, is looking to expand the service sector to re-balance domestic growth, and is working to cultivate new innovations instead of coddling large conglomerates.

Thus far, South Korea's economy has responded well to won strength, and its exporters have been increasing efficiencies and cutting costs. So South Korea is currently an area of interest for us. More generally, if further pronounced weakness occurs across emerging markets generally, we will be on the hunt for opportunities in other places where we see a proliferation of potential bargains.


China is, of course, the wild card for emerging markets as well as for the global economy. For two decades, China's economic growth has been turbocharged. Surging exports and intensive state-driven investment have lifted millions out of poverty and propelled China into the ranks of global economic superpowers. However, we believe the sustainability of China's old development model is now at the crunch point.

In China, the more-vibrant private sectors of the economy in small- and medium-sized enterprises typically have been starved of cash. The larger state-owned enterprises, as well as local governments, have meanwhile enjoyed easy access to loans, which they have often used to fund redundant projects offering low rates of return. We believe structural reforms are needed to sustain sufficient growth. But even then, most of the reform measures that the government has proposed will take time to have an effect. So the key determinant of China's growth for this year — and the next several — in our view, will be how aggressive policymakers will be in attempting to wean the economy off its reliance on credit and investment. We believe this transition is unlikely to happen smoothly and the risk of a sharp slowdown cannot be discounted. But we think not dealing with credit excesses would be a long-duration and potentially even worse scenario.


The fact that China has started to embrace reform is clearly good news. However, structural reforms are not easy to implement and it will be very difficult for China to easily reduce investment as a share of economic activity. What we should hope for in China is not a soft landing versus a hard landing but a long landing.

In sum, we think China's problems are large but not yet crippling. The good news for investors is that China's leadership seems to recognize that a serious deleveraging is in order, in addition to structural reform and a shift toward a more market-based economy to more efficiently allocate capital. So the question is not really whether China will be transformed — in many ways, that transformation has begun. Our focus is on how that transformation plays out, what is destroyed and what emerges to replace it, and where we will find stock opportunities as China's deleveraging unfolds.

Cindy Sweeting is president of Templeton Investment Counsel and director of portfolio management for Templeton Global Equity Group


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


What advice standard is likely to result from harmonization?

Deputy editor Bob Hordt and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss the SEC's effort to meld advice standards for brokers and advisers in a new proposal that is also consistent with the DOL fiduciary rule.

Latest news & opinion

Nontraded BDC sales in worst year since 2010

The illiquid product's three-year decline is partially due to new regulations and poor performance.

Tax reform debate sparks fresh interest in donor-advised funds

Schwab reports new accounts up 50% from last year, assets up 33%.

Nontraded REITs to post worst sales since 2002

The industry is on track to raise just $4.4 billion, well off the $19.6 billion it raised just four years ago, as new regulations hinder sales.

Broker protocol for recruiting a boon for clients

New research finds advisers whose firms have joined the agreement take better care of customers.

Meet our 2017 Women to Watch

Introducing 20 female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders, advancing the business of providing advice through their creativity and hard work.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print