Edward Jones settles cold-calling case for $750,000

The New Hampshire Bureau of Securities Regulation accused the firm of unlawfully soliciting clients on do-not-call lists

Feb 26, 2014 @ 6:17 pm

By Mason Braswell

Cold calling – a once-popular method of prospecting clients – was dealt another blow in a settlement with the New Hampshire Bureau of Securities Regulation.

Edward Jones has agreed to pay $750,000 to resolve claims that it unlawfully solicited New Hampshire residents whose phone numbers are registered on the National Do Not Call Registry.

“The bureau determined that on several occasions, EJ's financial advisers also failed to appropriately honor requests by New Hampshire residents to be added to EJ's firm-specific list,” the bureau's order, released Wednesday, read. “Further, the bureau determined that these calls were the result of EJ's inadequate training, supervisory and compliance practices and procedures in the area of telecommunications.”

In addition, the bureau accused Edward Jones, which has 50 branch offices in the state, of failing to train and supervise its brokers properly in the area of telephone solicitation.

Rules from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. prohibit members from soliciting by phone anyone who is on the Federal Trade Commission's do-not-call registry.

“This settlement is a significant step in curbing unwanted solicitation calls and the risk they may pose to New Hampshire investors,” bureau staff attorney Adrian LaRochelle said in a statement.

Edward Jones did not admit guilt as part of the settlement.

In addition to the monetary settlement, the firm agreed to cease and desist from further violations and agreed to modify its policies and procedures around telephone solicitation.

Edward Jones is required to revise branch-office audit procedures and report to the bureau its implementation of, and compliance with, all required undertakings.

“We're happy we've been able to negotiate a settlement with the state of New Hampshire,” said John Boul, a spokesman for the firm. “It's important to understand this matter did not involve any client losses or any negative impact to clients. Further, we're enhancing our communications training to address the issues raised by the state.”

The Bureau of Securities Regulation said the Edward Jones case was the fourth action it had brought regarding violations of telephone solicitation rules and that three additional investigations were still pending.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

CAIS's Brown: Big trends in wealth management

One of the biggest trends of 2017 was traditional institutional asset managers aiming their services at RIAs. How will this impact 2018? Matt Brown of CAIS explains.

Video Spotlight

Help Clients Be Prepared, Not Surprised

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Broker, retirement groups make last-minute pleas to change tax legislation

Pass-through provisions are target of groups representing employee-model brokerage firms, as well as retirement plan advisers.

House and Senate reach tentative compromise for tax overhaul

Lawmakers still need to get a cost analysis of their agreement, so it's not yet definite, according to a source.

Advisers' biggest fears for 2018

What keeps advisers up at night.

One adviser's story of losing his son to the opioid epidemic

John W. Brower, president and CEO of JW Brower & Associates, shares the story behind his son's death from a heroin overdose and how it inspired him to help others break the cycle of addiction.

Tax reform will boost food, chemicals, rail stocks. Technology? Not so much

Conagra and Berkshire Hathaway are two stocks that should benefit most from changes in the tax code.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print