Study: SEC staff sold shares before cases made public

SEC employees holding shares of five firms sold stock in 62% of the trades they initiated

Feb 27, 2014 @ 12:05 pm

People working for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission who owned stock in companies under investigation were more likely to sell shares than other investors in the months before the agency announced it was taking enforcement actions, according to a new academic paper.

SEC employees holding shares of five firms including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and General Electric Co. in 2010 and 2011 sold stock in 62% of the trades they initiated, compared with 50% among all the investors who traded those shares in that period, Emory University accounting professor Shivaram Rajgopal reports in the paper.

Mr. Rajgopal, who planned to present the work Thursday at a University of Virginia accounting seminar, said that while the analysis doesn't prove misconduct, it points out a suspicious pattern.

“It does suggest it is likely, or probable, that something is going on,” he said.

The records, obtained from the SEC under a Freedom of Information Act request by Mr. Rajgopal and his co-author, Roger M. White, a doctoral student at Georgia State University, don't identify individuals.

The limitation means the researchers couldn't tell if an individual trader made or lost money in a transaction. They also couldn't discern if those trading worked in jobs where they might have advance knowledge of actions that could push stock prices lower.


Mr. Rajgopal and Mr. White analyzed records of 7,200 trades from 2009 to 2011. Since 2009, most of the SEC's 4,000 employees have had to report their investments and trades to the agency.

“All we can do is show some statistical, circumstantial smoke, and we don't know if there is really a fire,” Mr. Rajgopal said. Still, he added, “It's not clear why we should find this pattern by sheer chance.”

John Nester, an SEC spokesman, declined to comment on the study.

Mr. Rajgopal is the Schaefer Chaired Professor in Accounting at Emory's Goizueta Business School. He earned his Ph.D. in accounting at the University of Iowa and taught at the University of Washington before joining Emory in 2010. His published research has focused on accounting quality, executive compensation and financial reporting. In 2008 and in 2012, he shared the Glen McLaughlin Prize for research in accounting and ethics, administered by the University of Oklahoma.

Brad Barber, a finance professor at the University of California-Davis School of Management who wasn't involved in Mr. Rajgopal's study, cautioned that the paper is in preliminary form and hasn't yet been through the academic review process.

“It nonetheless raises interesting questions, if proven to be accurate,” Mr. Barber said.

Beginning in August 2010, the SEC's ethics rules prohibited employees from buying or selling shares of companies under investigation and generally required them to obtain permission before trading. The rules forbid them from trading in any financial company directly regulated by the SEC, such as a bank- owned broker-dealer. The rules also generally require workers to hold any stock they buy while working at the SEC for six months before selling the shares.

The agency said in January it is reviewing the holdings of about 3,400 employees after some of its New York staff was found to own securities prohibited by ethics rules.


The trades involving the five companies were one part of Mr. Rajgopal's and Mr. White's study. According to the data, SEC employees made 87 trades in shares of JPMorgan, General Electric, Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and Johnson & Johnson in the 90 days before the SEC announced the companies had paid to settle enforcement claims.

In the case of Bank of America, for example, the researchers examined trades in the three-month pedriod before the firm agreed to pay $150 million on Feb. 4, 2010, to settle claims it misled shareholders about bonuses and losses while acquiring Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc.

In the month before the cases became public, more than 70% of the employee trades were sell orders. Buy and sell orders from all investors in those companies were evenly divided in those time periods, the researchers found.

Some of the employees' sales could have been motivated by a need to comply with the ethics rules on prohibited stocks, Mr. Rajgopal said. “But if that is the case, you still have to wonder about the timing,” he said.

For the broader analysis of the 7,200 trades, the researchers modeled a portfolio based on the SEC employees' investment decisions and found their stock trades beat a market index by as much as 16% from August 2009 to December 2011. They measured the one-year return for each transaction.

The profits generally didn't come from picking stocks, with the researchers finding that SEC employees “appear unable to capture gains in their buy portfolios.” Instead, almost all of the excess return stemmed from selling shares that later declined in value relative to the broader market, they wrote.

That finding indicates employees may have sold shares in companies they knew were under a non-public SEC investigation, the authors write.

“They do manage to get out before bad news hits the market,” Mr. Rajgopal said.

(Bloomberg News)


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Mar 13



InvestmentNews is honoring female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders at their firms. These women have advanced the business of providing advice through their passion, creativity, inclusive approach and... Learn more

Featured video


What's the first thing advisers should do when they get home from a conference?

After attending a financial services conference, advisers can be overwhelmed by options, choices and tools. What's the first thing they should do when they get back to their office?

Latest news & opinion

8 apps advisers love for getting stuff done

Smartphone apps that advisers are using in 2018 to run their business more efficiently.

Galvin's DOL fiduciary rule enforcement triggers industry plea for court decision

Plaintiffs warned the Fifth Circuit that Massachusetts' move against Scottrade signaled that the partially implemented regulation can raise costs for financial firms.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

Gun violence hits investment strategies, sparks political debates with advisers

Screening out weapons companies has limited downside.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print