Nontraded REITs want delay in Finra's proposed disclosure rule

Industry backs the rule but wants implementation pushed out to late 2015

Mar 14, 2014 @ 9:14 am

By Bruce Kelly

The nontraded real estate investment trust industry wants to wait until the end of next year to implement new securities industry rules that would provide investors more accurate information about the valuation of nontraded REITs and other illiquid investments known as direct participation programs.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. proposal would implement the rule change closer to the end of this year — six months after the date the Securities and Exchange Commission approves it. The SEC is considering the rule and Wednesday was the last day for the industry to submit comment letters about Finra's proposal.

The Investment Program Association, an industry trade group, wants the SEC and Finra to slow any changes to how REIT valuations appear on client account statements and give more time to nontraded REIT sponsors and the broker-dealers that sell the products to adjust.

“The IPA respectfully submits that an implementation period of 18 months is essential to avoid adverse consequences not only for industry participants and the industries which rely upon unlisted DPPs and REITs for capital, but more importantly for investors,” according to a letter posted to the SEC's website Wednesday and written by Mark Goldberg, chairman of the IPA and president of Carey Financial.

Uncertainty around the proposed rule has already slowed REIT sales, he wrote.

“The IPA believes that the perceived pendency of the changes proposed by Finra has had a chilling effect on unlisted DPP and REIT new offerings,” Mr. Goldberg wrote.

“For example, as of Jan. 1, 2014, there were approximately $65.6 billion of unlisted REIT securities in registration,” he wrote. “Of this amount, only $3.4 billion was placed into registration in the fourth quarter of 2013, approximately 38% below the 'replacement rate' of new offerings required to preserve the amount of potential equity fundraising of the unlisted REIT industry.”

(Don't miss the story of how Inland Real Estate Investment Corp. is plotting its comeback.)

After three years of sounding out the securities and REIT industries, Finra proposed rule changes to the SEC last month that would give investors a truer picture of what it costs to buy shares of a nontraded REIT. If approved by the SEC, the rule would do away with the practice of broker-dealers listing the per-share value of nontraded REITs at $10, the common price at which brokers sell them to clients.

Instead, the Finra rule would take into consideration various fees and commissions paid to brokers and dealer managers, reducing the share price on each customer account.

Independent broker-dealers nearly are the only vendor of nontraded REITs, sales of which reached nearly $20 billion last year, double in 2012. Indeed, nontraded REIT sales have been booming at independent broker-dealers, and that boom has been generating more commission for representatives and their firms.

Reps typically earn a 7% commission on sales of nontraded REITs and other illiquid investment products, making nontraded REITs one of the more profitable products sold by brokers.

The largest independent broker-dealer, LPL Financial, “is one of the largest distributors of [direct participation programs] and REITs to the retail investor marketplace,” according to a comment letter posted on the SEC's website Wednesday by Steven Morrison, LPL's associate counsel. “In 2013, LPL sold in excess of $3.7 billion in REITs and DPP products.”

The nontraded REIT industry backs the increased disclosure, including the deduction of commissions to reps and dealer manager fees from the $10-a-share price on the client's account statement.

“Net investments” should be “determined based only on the deduction of sales commissions and dealer manager fees, thereby conforming to the 'point of sale' cost deduction approach taken for other securities and providing equitable treatment for unlisted DPPs and REITs,” Mr. Goldberg wrote.

But a significant limitation in the proposed rule change is including less concrete or estimated aspects of the REIT's valuations to be listed on the customer account statement, according to several comment letters by industry executives.

“There are some aspects of the proposal which introduce complex and unreliable methodologies to arrive at an estimated price, which will have the unintended consequence of confusing customers,” wrote David Bellaire, executive vice president and general counsel of the Financial Services Institute Inc., the lobbying organization representing independent broker-dealers and financial advisers. “Financial advisers who advise clients with respect to these products may also experience challenges when explaining how these estimated valuations are calculated and what they mean to the investor.”


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

May 02


Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


What's the first thing advisers should do when they get home from a conference?

After attending a financial services conference, advisers can be overwhelmed by options, choices and tools. What's the first thing they should do when they get back to their office?

Latest news & opinion

8 apps advisers love for getting stuff done

Smartphone apps that advisers are using in 2018 to run their business more efficiently.

Galvin's DOL fiduciary rule enforcement triggers industry plea for court decision

Plaintiffs warned the Fifth Circuit that Massachusetts' move against Scottrade signaled that the partially implemented regulation can raise costs for financial firms.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

Gun violence hits investment strategies, sparks political debates with advisers

Screening out weapons companies has limited downside.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print