Editorial

Can Finra serve investors and the industry?

Mar 16, 2014 @ 12:01 am

Is it possible to serve two masters? The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. would do well to keep that question in mind as it tries to sort out its responsibilities to investors and the securities industry.

The context for this self-assessment is a new study by the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association and an exposť in The Wall Street Journal, each of which concluded that Finra isn't doing enough to disclose important background information about brokers.

The target of both these groups is BrokerCheck, the database of records that Finra maintains and makes available to investors for broker background checks.

TWO SLAPS

PIABA, a group of lawyers who represent investors in arbitration cases, took Finra to task for omitting certain information from BrokerCheck, in-cluding brokers' tax liens for less than $100,000, personal bankruptcies more than 10 years old, terminations from previous employers that don't involve investor protection issues, and failing grades on industry exams. Finra has access to this information but withholds it based on privacy concerns for brokers.

The Wall Street Journal took a slightly different tack. It looked at the records Finra is supposed to make available on BrokerCheck and found 1,600 instances where required information about brokers was missing.

This information included personal bankruptcies less than 10 years old, as well as criminal charges relating to burglary, forgery, larceny, bad checks, identity theft, assault with a deadly weapon, stalking, sexual battery, false imprisonment, bail jumping and drug offenses.

Although Finra relies on firms and brokers to self-report negative information, it would be foolhardy not to have some system of checks and balances in place for both investigative purposes and to serve as a deterrent. Certainly, it is fair to ask Finra, if The Wall Street Journal was able to cross-reference the names of brokers against criminal and bankruptcy court filings, why hasn't it done so?

For an agency that usually gets its back up rather easily whenever it is criticized, Finra was somewhat chastened by the newspaper's findings. It acknowledged its failure, calling the situation “unacceptable” and promised to update its database.

Let's hope it follows through and makes good on that promise.

Its reaction to the PIABA report, on the other hand, was somewhat different. Finra took a defensive posture and argued that it needs to be fair to brokers in determining what information it releases, while still protecting the investing public.

FINRA'S DILEMMA

The dilemma Finra faces goes to the heart of being a self-regulatory organization.

It also raises serious questions: Can Finra protect both investors and the privacy of brokers at the same time? When there is a conflict, with whom does Finra side?

On its website, Finra describes its mission this way: “Finra is dedicated to investor protection and market integrity through effective and efficient regulation of the securities industry.” It further states: “We're an independent not-for-profit organization authorized by Congress to protect America's investors by making sure the securities industry operates fairly and honestly.”

It doesn't mention the privacy of brokers — anywhere.

PIABA's call for more disclosure is serious and shouldn't be dismissed out of hand. Based on the PIABA study, two U.S. senators also have called on Finra to upgrade BrokerCheck.

Reasonable people can argue whether certain information is material to investors. But unfortunately, Finra seems to have made up its mind already.

Maybe it isn't possible to serve two masters after all.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video

Events

The power of data

Your clients have financial news and data at their fingertips, but donít know how to interpret it. Katy Gibson of Envestnet|Yodlee and Blake Kannady of Envestnet discuss the power of leveraging aggregated data.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Lightyear Capital takes 50% stake in $9 billion HPM Partners

Private equity backing could fuel acquisitions by the large RIA.

Tax reform: 7 essential strategies for financial advisers

While advisers face the difficult task of analyzing the law's impact, they will also have a significant opportunity to prove their value by implementing money-saving strategies for clients as well as their own businesses.

Tax law: Everything advisers need to know about the pass-through provision

The provision is tricky, but could provide advisers and business-owner clients with sizable tax savings.

Bill requiring fiduciary disclosure reintroduced in New Jersey

Measures would obligate financial advisers to tell clients they do not have to act in their best interests.

Merrill Lynch to let advisers text with clients

Texting has been a popular mode of communication for years, but in the past the firm's regulations have prevented advisers from using it.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print