FSI opposes Finra proposal for automated account information collection

CARDS would pose risks and challenges to its members, broker-dealer group contends

Mar 20, 2014 @ 1:56 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

+ Zoom

The organization representing independent broker-dealers has come out against a Finra proposal to ramp up its collection of account information.

In a comment letter submitted Thursday, the Financial Services Institute Inc. wrote that the broker-dealer regulator's proposed Comprehensive Automated Risk Data System would pose substantial costs and management challenges to its members and would put sensitive investor information at risk.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. put out a CARDS concept release in December. The system would allow Finra to gather from clearing firms reams of account information about investments, transactions and investor profiles.

Individual brokerage firms would have to submit their information to clearing firms.

Finra said that frequent collection of data in aggregate would help it identify sales practice misconduct more efficiently and effectively than it is able to do on a firm-by-firm basis.

Although FSI lauded Finra's attempt to improve market oversight, it contended that the proposal is unworkable.

“As proposed, CARDS presents significant challenges due to its ambitious scope and massive scale,” wrote David Bellaire, FSI executive vice president and general counsel.

“These challenges include data standardization, data complexity, data translation, system infrastructure and the incredible financial costs required to develop, implement and maintain CARDS,” he wrote. “We are concerned the development and implementation of CARDS is simply not feasible while preserving widespread investor access to the services of independent broker-dealers and financial advisers.”

Finra is showing no signs of backing down on the project.

“We remain very committed to the CARDS initiative,” Carlo di Florio, Finra executive vice president for risk and strategy, said at an Investment Company Institute conference in Orlando, Fla., this week.

But Finra has already tweaked the proposal.

After widespread alarm about the potential for data breaches, Finra on March 4 said that it wouldn't require the submission of personally identifiable information, such as a client's name, address or tax identification number.

Despite that change, data remain vulnerable during the process of collecting and transmitting it to clearing firms, according to the FSI.

“While Finra may not have the [personally identifiable information], the data security concerns with consolidated financial data still remain but have shifted from Finra to the clearing firms,” Mr. Bellaire wrote.

Another problem is that data collected directly from investment product providers wouldn't be included in CARDS and adding it later to the CARDS review would be a costly undertaking for FSI firms, according to the group.

FSI also warned that CARDS would require developing a common data standard for all of the information that flows in different formats from investment product companies.

“The enormous costs of creating this process will likely be passed on to firms and advisers,” Mr. Bellaire wrote. “If Finra begins to require new standardized CARDS data fields, the costs will be significant for firms and advisers to change their systems, repaper their accounts and enter the new information in their systems.”

So far, Finra has received 57 comment letters. The deadline for submission is Friday.

Not all the missives have been negative. The Consumer Federation of America is supportive.

The initiative would strengthen Finra's ability to assess business conduct patterns across the financial industry, according to Barbara Roper, the CFA's director of investor protection. “To the degree that analysis allows Finra to identify troubling developments and problematic practices and shut them down before significant harm occurs, the benefits to investors would be self-evident,” she wrote in a March 11 letter.

In Orlando, Mr. di Florio said that CARDS would bolster Finra's risk analytics so that it could more easily spot anomalies, such as an elderly client with a conservative profile holding risky investments.

“Rather than go in and do a lot of random sampling across a host of accounts, let's just target those accounts, those branches, those brokers, those transactions” that pose concerns, he said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video

Events

Carson Group's West: Family feud financial dynamics

Finding (and retaining) wealthy families to manage their wealth can be challenging. Carson Group's Paul West explains the secret to family success - and how can you keep them as clients for generations.

Video Spotlight

The Search for Income

Sponsored by PGIM Investments

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

E*Trade acquiring custodian Trust Company of America

Discount broker buying second-tier custodian for $275 million.

Another thousand Dow points higher, and investors yawn

Market milestones keep falling like dominoes, with 51 records broken so far this year.

LPL retains $570 million with super-OSJ deal

Kansas-based nVision Wealth will come under supervision of Chicago-based IHT Wealth Management.

How does your advisory firm stack up?

Comparing a firm's pay to the competition can point out vast flaws.

10 signs your client is cheating on you

Sure signs that clients may be on the way out the door.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print