Other Voices

IN Voices

Apr 6, 2014 @ 12:01 am

How many sharks are in the water?

A

column by Bruce Kelly on a broker-dealer that employs an unusually large number of brokers with disclosure events on their BrokerCheck records touched off a debate among readers about just how extensive the issue of problem brokers is in the industry.

Another great article, Bruce. Even though I make a living as a lawyer pursuing bad brokers, I am still sad to see the industry — 95% of whom are honest, caring people — suffer because of the few.” — Brian Mahany

How do you come up with the 5% of brokers are bad or unethical? It sounds like you are just pulling numbers out of thin air to justify your existence. Typical lawyer. “ — Guest

I was in the industry during the "80s and had my principal's license. I have good firsthand knowledge. There is a small percentage of the industry that has no clue of what they are doing. If you look at the statistics on BrokerCheck (as compiled in a recent WSJ article), there is just a small percentage of bad brokers out there. Unfortunately, the mess they create hurts the image of the industry.” — Brian Mahany

Wow! You're jumping all over Brian for saying just 5% of brokers are bad or unethical?!?! A LOT of us think the percentage is A LOT higher than that!! First of all, it's a service industry that doesn't have to take a fiduciary responsibility to its customers. You don't think that opens up a whole realm of irresponsibility to clients? Many bad eggs actually convinced themselves that they are moral, yet they are out only for themselves. Heck, Allen Stanford is serving 110 years and he still claims that his clients would get their money if only authorities hadn't intervened to stop him!!!!!” — AssnapKined

Frivolous complaints get on a broker's permanent record; even a manager who doesn't like a broker can slap something on a broker's U4 and make up anything to fire them, and ruin their life and career. Who is protecting the financial advisers and brokers trying to do their best dealing directly with the investing public? No one. We are the bad guys, like how we are depicted in that garbage movie "The Wolf of Wall Street.' LAME!” — Guest

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Proposal to delay the DOL fiduciary rule is a turning point

Senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. and managing editor Christina Nelson discuss the Labor Department's latest move and what it means for the future of the regulation and the firms preparing for it.

Latest news & opinion

Will Jeffrey Gundlach's Trump-like approach on Twitter work in financial services?

The DoubleLine CEO's attacks on Wall Street Journal reporters is igniting a discussion on what's fair game on social media.

Fidelity wins arb case against wine mogul but earns a rebuke from Finra

In the case of investor Peter Deutsch, Fidelity doesn't have to pay any compensation, but regulator said firm put its interests ahead of his.

Plaintiffs win in Tibble vs. Edison 401(k) fee case

After a decade of activity around the lawsuit, including a hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court, judge rules a prudent fiduciary would have invested in institutional shares.

Advisers get more breathing room to make Form ADV changes

RIAs can enter '0' in some new parts of the document before their annual filing next year.

Since banking scandal, Wells Fargo advisers with more than $19.2 billion leave firm

Despite a trying year, the firm has said it will sweeten signing bonuses for veteran advisers.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print