Other Voices

IN Voices

Apr 6, 2014 @ 12:01 am

How many sharks are in the water?

A

column by Bruce Kelly on a broker-dealer that employs an unusually large number of brokers with disclosure events on their BrokerCheck records touched off a debate among readers about just how extensive the issue of problem brokers is in the industry.

Another great article, Bruce. Even though I make a living as a lawyer pursuing bad brokers, I am still sad to see the industry — 95% of whom are honest, caring people — suffer because of the few.” — Brian Mahany

How do you come up with the 5% of brokers are bad or unethical? It sounds like you are just pulling numbers out of thin air to justify your existence. Typical lawyer. “ — Guest

I was in the industry during the "80s and had my principal's license. I have good firsthand knowledge. There is a small percentage of the industry that has no clue of what they are doing. If you look at the statistics on BrokerCheck (as compiled in a recent WSJ article), there is just a small percentage of bad brokers out there. Unfortunately, the mess they create hurts the image of the industry.” — Brian Mahany

Wow! You're jumping all over Brian for saying just 5% of brokers are bad or unethical?!?! A LOT of us think the percentage is A LOT higher than that!! First of all, it's a service industry that doesn't have to take a fiduciary responsibility to its customers. You don't think that opens up a whole realm of irresponsibility to clients? Many bad eggs actually convinced themselves that they are moral, yet they are out only for themselves. Heck, Allen Stanford is serving 110 years and he still claims that his clients would get their money if only authorities hadn't intervened to stop him!!!!!” — AssnapKined

Frivolous complaints get on a broker's permanent record; even a manager who doesn't like a broker can slap something on a broker's U4 and make up anything to fire them, and ruin their life and career. Who is protecting the financial advisers and brokers trying to do their best dealing directly with the investing public? No one. We are the bad guys, like how we are depicted in that garbage movie "The Wolf of Wall Street.' LAME!” — Guest

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

INTV

Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.

Legislation would make it harder for investors to sue mutual funds over high fees

A plaintiff would have to state in their initial complaint why fiduciary duty was breached, and then prove the violation with 'clear and convincing evidence.'

Relying on trainees, Merrill Lynch boosts adviser headcount in 2017

Questions remain about long-term effectiveness of wirehouse's move away from recruiting experienced brokers.

Supreme Court review of SEC judges could roil pending cases

But long-term, the agency may get around questions of constitutionality by changing the way it brings on administrative law judges.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print