Letters to the Editor

Apr 27, 2014 @ 12:01 am

I read the On Retirement column "Making tough decisions to fix the Social Security system," (InvestmentNews, March 24).

Suggesting that the financial imbalances of Social Security can be solved in 15 minutes or less does a serious disservice to a program on which millions depend.

The solution discussed in the column is based on a programáthat assumes thatáthe rest of the government is running perfectly. The program contends, for example, that removing the payroll cap fixes 72% of Social Security's program.

The software doesn't tell users, however, that their solutions willádivert about $10 trillion of the tax base away from debt control. So it basically fixes Social Security by breaking everything else.

The solution simply makes Social Securityáthe highest priority of the government. How does one justify fixing Social Security instead of Medicare?

The solution will make Medicare $10 trillion less easy to fix.

How is Social Security more important than Head Start or other educational programs that face cuts? Households headed by someone 65 and older are the wealthiest of any age demographic, yet this solution would reward these people over caring for children living in poverty.

When we ignore all the other services provided by the government, then it is easy to fix Social Security.

The idea that demographics are the problem of Social Security is at best debatable. Even with the changes in life ex-pectancy cited in the column, average workers born in 1950 or later expect to get back less inábenefits than they contributed.

How can they be part of the problem?

Although there are tough choices to be made on the issue of Social Security, this solution avoids any tough choices. It re-wards immediate consumption at the expense of other people.

Brenton C. Smith


Fix Social Security Now

Marietta, Ga.

Regarding the On Retirement column "Making tough decisions to fix the Social Security system," (InvestmentNews, March 24), I took the survey and passed, if you can call it that.

I got a +148%. Gosh, it is that simple for us to fix this system!

Here is what strikes me: Most people are ignorant of this important source of future income for themselves.

Recently, I was sitting next to a guy at the Social Security office who is a construction worker, basically Joe lunch bucket.

I posed the question about the percentage of his income exposed to the tax as opposed to someone making $1 million a year. He had no clue and thought they were the same.

When I explained the difference, he didn't believe me.

I have been receiving benefits now for a little more than six years. When I think about the capital sum that it would take to pay my benefits, I appreciate the challenge we have as a nation.

That is especially true when I consider that my wife also receives a benefit on her account. We have way more assets than average, and yet we would be hard-pressed to make it if it weren't for Social Security.

The survey is great, and I think all Americans should have to take it. It is an excellent teaching tool.

Leonard H. Abrams

Chief executive

Plantech Inc.

Wooster, Ohio


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Why Brinker is ramping up its services for RIAs

Brinker Capital introduced a new platform aimed at providing services to independent advisers. Brinker's Brendan McConnell explains how the firm will differentiate from a crowded field.

Video Spotlight

Help Clients Be Prepared, Not Surprised

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

RIAs struggle to keep clients grounded amid stock market euphoria

With equities at record levels, financial advisers are confronted with realities of greed and fear.

Regulators showing renewed interest in cracking down on investment fees

SEC, Finra targeting high-fee share classes, 12b-1 fees and failure to give sales load discounts and waivers to investors.

Tax update: Brady says sales tax deduction in final bill

Taxpayers will be able to deduct state income taxes or state sales taxes in addition to property levies — up to a $10,000 cap.

Complexity of new indexed annuities causing concern

Insurers are using 'hybrid' indices as a way to differentiate themselves, but critics contend the products are less transparent, more confusing and don't add financial benefit.

Critics say regulation hasn't curbed overly rosy projections for indexed universal life insurance

They say rule didn't go far enough and more stringent measures may be necessary.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print