Letters to the Editor

Apr 27, 2014 @ 12:01 am

I read the On Retirement column "Making tough decisions to fix the Social Security system," (InvestmentNews, March 24).

Suggesting that the financial imbalances of Social Security can be solved in 15 minutes or less does a serious disservice to a program on which millions depend.

The solution discussed in the column is based on a program that assumes that the rest of the government is running perfectly. The program contends, for example, that removing the payroll cap fixes 72% of Social Security's program.

The software doesn't tell users, however, that their solutions will divert about $10 trillion of the tax base away from debt control. So it basically fixes Social Security by breaking everything else.

The solution simply makes Social Security the highest priority of the government. How does one justify fixing Social Security instead of Medicare?

The solution will make Medicare $10 trillion less easy to fix.

How is Social Security more important than Head Start or other educational programs that face cuts? Households headed by someone 65 and older are the wealthiest of any age demographic, yet this solution would reward these people over caring for children living in poverty.

When we ignore all the other services provided by the government, then it is easy to fix Social Security.

The idea that demographics are the problem of Social Security is at best debatable. Even with the changes in life ex-pectancy cited in the column, average workers born in 1950 or later expect to get back less in benefits than they contributed.

How can they be part of the problem?

Although there are tough choices to be made on the issue of Social Security, this solution avoids any tough choices. It re-wards immediate consumption at the expense of other people.

Brenton C. Smith


Fix Social Security Now

Marietta, Ga.

Regarding the On Retirement column "Making tough decisions to fix the Social Security system," (InvestmentNews, March 24), I took the survey and passed, if you can call it that.

I got a +148%. Gosh, it is that simple for us to fix this system!

Here is what strikes me: Most people are ignorant of this important source of future income for themselves.

Recently, I was sitting next to a guy at the Social Security office who is a construction worker, basically Joe lunch bucket.

I posed the question about the percentage of his income exposed to the tax as opposed to someone making $1 million a year. He had no clue and thought they were the same.

When I explained the difference, he didn't believe me.

I have been receiving benefits now for a little more than six years. When I think about the capital sum that it would take to pay my benefits, I appreciate the challenge we have as a nation.

That is especially true when I consider that my wife also receives a benefit on her account. We have way more assets than average, and yet we would be hard-pressed to make it if it weren't for Social Security.

The survey is great, and I think all Americans should have to take it. It is an excellent teaching tool.

Leonard H. Abrams

Chief executive

Plantech Inc.

Wooster, Ohio


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Carson Group's West: Family feud financial dynamics

Finding (and retaining) wealthy families to manage their wealth can be challenging. Carson Group's Paul West explains the secret to family success - and how can you keep them as clients for generations.

Video Spotlight

The Search for Income

Sponsored by PGIM Investments

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

How does your advisory firm stack up?

Comparing a firm's pay to the competition can point out vast flaws.

10 signs your client is cheating on you

Sure signs that clients may be on the way out the door.

Morgan Stanley sees slower fee-based asset flows on fiduciary rule delay

Flows to advisory accounts, while still higher than the start of 2016, dropped off more than 20% from Q2 and were the lowest in a year.

How adviser salaries stack up to other jobs

Median compensation hovers just under $100,000 on the low end and reaches nearly $300,000 for bosses.

Finra ranking brokers in effort to crack down on industry's bad apples

All 634.403 reps have been ranked based on factors such as prior regulatory disclosures, disciplinary actions and employment history.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print