No edge for active managers as stock prices diverge

Still, investors can bet on managers who can outperform

Apr 29, 2014 @ 12:01 am

By Carl O'Donnell

Think today's low correlation between stock prices signals a so-called stock picker's market? Think again.

In fact, there is no evidence that a higher discrepancy between stock prices is correlated with better returns for actively managed funds as a whole, according to a recent study by S&P Dow Jones Indices.

There is, however, evidence that the spread between individual funds' performance widens during these periods, increasing the premium on an active manager's skill (or luck, depending on your perspective).

“The way I would look at it, in periods of high dispersion, your decisions have much more impact,” said Tim Edwards, director of index investment strategy and an author of the study, “Dispersion: Measuring Market Opportunity.” “The difference between successful or unsuccessful managers is exaggerated during these periods.”

(Don't miss: Time to sell stocks?)

The concept of “dispersion” is similar to “correlation,” but also addresses the magnitude of stock movements, among other factors. Higher dispersion is often, but not always, found during periods of higher volatility.

The fact that active managers don't outperform in times of high dispersion shouldn't be a surprise: It's mathematically impossible for active managers as a group to beat the market, said Ben Johnson, director of passive funds research at Morningstar Inc.

“Regardless of skill or luck, it's impossible for active managers to beat the laws of mathematics,” Mr. Johnson said. “This isn't Lake Wobegon, not every active manager can be above average.”

Of course, investors aren't as concerned with the performance of active managers as a group as they are with the funds in which they are invested. In theory, higher dispersion should mean a bigger reward for picking a top-performing active manager.

The problem is that it's nearly impossible to discern which active managers are skillful and which are merely lucky, Mr. Edwards said. Past studies by S&P Dow Jones Indices have shown that strong performance by a fund in one year is rarely an indicator that the fund will do well the following year.

(More: Rising stock market volatility is no “sell” signal)

This doesn't mean skill doesn't exist, said Wally Weitz, president of active fund manager Weitz Investment. Focused, patient active managers can develop and sustain a competitive advantage, but this edge may take decades to become evident, and will frequently be veiled by market noise, he said.

“There is evidence that you can identify statistically significant alpha among certain funds after controlling for other variables,” Mr. Johnson added.

It's also possible that skillful management is harder to identify in the S&P 500, a highly liquid stock index. The benefits of good calls are much more obvious in illiquid markets or some areas of fixed income, according to Barry Fennell, a senior analyst at Lipper Inc.

The fact that high dispersion seems to create a premium on skill doesn't mean investors should wait for market volatility to buy an active fund, Mr. Fennell said. There are many instances in which periods of low dispersion — such as recessions — open up opportunities for active managers to buy up good stocks at a discount, Mr. Weitz said.

The most important basis for selecting an active manager is making sure you have faith in the manager's investing philosophy, as well as his or her ability to execute.

“Investing is ultimately still an art,” Mr. Weitz said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

May 02

Conference

Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

State measures to prevent elder financial abuse gaining steam

A growing number of states are looking to pass rules preventing exploitation of seniors.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print