Firms use looming bonus disclosure rule to turn up the heat on recruits

Some managers are telling prospects that they should consider moving now, while the terms of deals are still private

May 8, 2014 @ 3:05 pm

By Mason Braswell

Strike while the iron is hot and the deals are still private. That's the message some branch managers are sending to prospective recruits.

A proposed Finra rule requiring brokers to disclose recruiting bonuses to clients is still awaiting approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission, but managers at brokerage firms already are taking the opportunity to reach out to potential recruits, encouraging them to make the move before it goes into effect.

“There's no doubt that it's happening,” Danny Sarch, a career consultant with Leitner Sarch Consultants, said of the practice. “I think it's a scare tactic that they use.”

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.'s proposed rule, which was sent to the SEC in March, would affect advisers who are paid more than $100,000 to move, requiring them to disclose that compensation to clients, in addition to any fees that the clients may incur as a result of the transition.

Some critics have said that could lead to some awkward conversations with clients and make advisers' transitions more difficult. But the timing of any final rule is still uncertain as many of the large firms have written to the SEC to say that the rule is impossible to enforce as it is currently written.

Meanwhile, complex managers at large brokerage firms are telling some branch managers to tell prospective recruits that the rule could be made final as early as Labor Day, according to a branch manager at Wells Fargo Advisors who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The move was designed to “put the squeeze on exiting brokers,” the manager said.

A Wells Fargo spokeswoman, Rachelle Rowe, declined to comment.

In another instance, Ameriprise complex manager Matthew Davis in Boston sent a letter to the home of a local UBS Wealth Management Americas adviser that had the text of Finra's proposed rule attached and warned of the “impact this impending rule could have on your potential transition.”

“I'm writing to let you know that this disclosure rule has a new name, Finra 2243, and is one step closer to reality,” Mr. Davis wrote in the letter, which was reviewed by InvestmentNews. “With tax season behind us, the timing for us to meet is as good as it's ever going to be.”

Ameriprise spokesman Chris Reese said in a statement that the letter was not a scare tactic, and was meant to be educational.

“Since 2008, we've helped more than 2,000 experienced advisers transition to our firm,” he said. “We know that helping advisers understand the landscape and regulatory changes leads to a smooth transition for their practice and their clients.”

Rick Rummage, a career consultant with the Rummage Group, said that he had heard of recruiters who brought it up to put pressure on advisers when the rule first came out.

“Advisers would sometimes call me and bring it up that they got a call from a recruiter using that, saying, 'You have to move,'” Mr. Rummage said.

Recruiters interviewed for this story denied using the tactic.

“It strikes me as desperation,” Mr. Sarch said. He said that he generally brings the disclosure rule up only as a matter of making sure that advisers understood the potential impact.

“I don't think it's going to be as big of a deal,” he said.

Mr. Rummage estimated that only about one in 10 advisers who are considering moving are worried about it.

Most advisers should be able to handle the conversations with clients if the rule ended up being implemented, according to Andrew Parish, founder of AdvisorHub Inc.

“It's going to be a Y2K event,” Mr. Parish said. “Everybody will make a lot of noise about it. But the reality is that if you have good relationships with clients, there's probably a good portion that will be impressed you're making a move.”

“[Managers and recruiters] are definitely using it,” he added. “But do I think that it is a tactic that has much impact? No.”

Finra spokeswoman Michelle Ong did not respond to a request for comment.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Advisers on the Move

Does your pay stack up?

The Adviser Research Dashboard

Based on data collected through InvestmentNews' annual adviser research studies, this interactive, customizable tool allows you to view detailed data on compensation, staffing and financial performance practices from across the industry.

Learn more »

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


WisdomTree's Maute: Developing elegant tech-enabled solutions

Advisers need unique technology-enabled solutions in order to have more time to expand their practice, according to WisdomTree's Alisa Maute. What can be done today to create a more thriving business of tomorrow.

Latest news & opinion

Can the SEC and DOL really harmonize advice standards for brokers and advisers?

Experts ponder what a Securities and Exchange Commission fiduciary rule will look like, and whether it will help unify requirements across agencies.

Nontraded BDC sales in worst year since 2010

The illiquid product's three-year decline is partially due to new regulations and poor performance.

Tax reform debate sparks fresh interest in donor-advised funds

Schwab reports new accounts up 50% from last year, assets up 33%.

Nontraded REITs to post worst sales since 2002

The industry is on track to raise just $4.4 billion, well off the $19.6 billion it raised just four years ago, as new regulations hinder sales.

Broker protocol for recruiting a boon for clients

New research finds advisers whose firms have joined the agreement take better care of customers.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print