RIAs should be forced to hire outside examiners: Gallagher

Afraid of another Madoff scandal, SEC member says proposal would increase oversight of advisers

May 20, 2014 @ 2:35 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Securities and Exchange Commission member Daniel Gallagher wants registered investment advisers to be forced to hire third-party contractors to conduct examinations.

In a remarks at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.'s annual conference in Washington, Mr. Gallagher recommended that the SEC write a regulation that would require advisers to hire an examiner to review their operations.

The rule would be similar to one the agency adopted in 2009 that forces advisers who maintain custody of client assets to bring in an auditor to verify that the funds are safe.

“How we examine advisers would be the subject of the rule I'm talking about,” Mr. Gallagher told reporters on the sidelines of the Finra conference.

In a Q&A afterward with Finra chairman and chief executive Richard G. Ketchum, Mr. Gallagher said he is worried that the SEC might miss the next huge investor rip-off along the lines of the multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Bernard Madoff.

The problem, Mr. Gallagher said, is that the agency lacks the resources to oversee the roughly 11,000 registered investment advisers. The SEC annually examines about 9% of them.

“We have no Rick Ketchum on the adviser side and no SRO,” Mr. Gallagher said. “We are sitting there with our chins out, waiting to get pummeled.”

Finra, the industry-funded broker-dealer regulator, which oversees approximately 4,300 firms, in the past pushed legislation to extend its authority to include investment advisers. It is no longer pursuing such a measure.

Under the rule Mr. Gallagher has in mind, the third-party auditor could be an existing SRO or it could be a private-sector firm. The competition between SROs and other firms would bring prices down, he said.

“That will be a much more competitive and efficient marketplace, I think in particular for the dual-hatted registrants,” Mr. Gallagher said, referring to investment advisers who also are registered as brokers. “They will be inclined to say, 'Let's go with what we know'” and select Finra for examinations.

Mr. Gallagher is one of five SEC commissioners and one of two Republicans on the body. At least three members have to agree to propose a rule.

In 2012, a bill that would establish an SRO to oversee investment advisers died without coming to a committee vote, despite strong Finra support. That measure would have required advisers to register with an SRO.

Congress does not need to weigh in on the rule that he supports, Mr. Gallagher said. The rule would not give the third-party auditor rule making or enforcement authority, as the 2012 legislation would have.

Mr. Ketchum applauded Mr. Gallagher's idea as a way to increase oversight of investment advisers.

“This is a creative alternative,” Mr. Ketchum told reporters at a press conference at the Finra meeting. “There's a huge disparity of oversight with regard to investment advisers. It's not an OK environment when you can go decades without being examined. That creates a risk for investors that's not appropriate.”

He was quick to add that Finra has no intention of lobbying to revive a bill that would expand its regulatory reach. He also pointed out that all he knew of Mr. Gallagher's proposal was based on what Mr. Gallagher said in a recent speech and his comments at the Finra meeting.

“This is his proposal, not ours,” Mr. Ketchum said. “It's a decision for the commission to make, not for Finra.”


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Top questions surrounding future of DOL fiduciary rule

Reporter Greg Iacurci and managing editor Christina Nelson discuss the biggest uncertainties springing from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to vacate the regulation.

Latest news & opinion

What the next market downturn means for small RIAs

Firms that have enjoyed AUM growth because of the runup in stocks may find it hard to adjust to declining revenues if the market suffers a major correction.

DOL fiduciary rule likely to live on despite appeals court loss

Future developments will hinge on whether the Labor Department continues the fight to remake the regulation its own way.

DOL fiduciary rule: Industry reacts to Fifth Circuit ruling

Groups on both sides of the fiduciary debate had plenty to say.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacates DOL fiduciary rule

In split decision, judges say agency exceeded authority.

UBS, after dumping the broker protocol, continues to see brokers come and go

The wirehouse has seen 14 individuals or teams leave and five join for a net loss of $2.4 billion in AUM


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print