Ex-John Thomas hedge fund manager loses bid to toss SEC case

George Jarkesy Jr. must face charges of steering bloated fees to the John Thomas Financial brokerage

Jun 11, 2014 @ 10:58 am

Houston hedge-fund manager George Jarkesy Jr. must face a Securities and Exchange Commission case in which he was accused of steering bloated fees to the John Thomas Financial Inc. brokerage.

Mr. Jarkesy lost a bid to throw out the case, an administrative proceeding in which he is accused of defrauding investors.

Mr. Jarkesy and his investment fund management group Patriot28, formerly known as John Thomas Capital Management, argued that they can't get a fair hearing before the SEC. Mr. Jarkesy said the agency has prejudged him as a result of findings in a settlement with John Thomas Financial's founder, Anastasios (Tommy) Belesis.

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington ruled that Mr. Jarkesy has to pursue his claims through an established process that includes hearings before an administrative law judge, SEC commissioners and, finally, a court of appeals.

“To the extent that the plaintiffs believe their cause has been prejudged by the SEC commissioners, they may seek review, if necessary, before the court of appeals, but the statute leaves no room for this court to provide them the relief they seek,” Ms. Howell wrote.

Mark Bierbower, an attorney for Mr. Jarkesy, didn't immediately respond to a phone message yesterday seeking comment on the ruling.

The SEC brought claims against Mr. Jarkesy and Mr. Belesis in March 2013, saying they had defrauded hedge fund investors. Mr. Belesis settled the allegations against him in December by agreeing to be banned from the securities industry. The deal gave him the option of applying for reinstatement after a year.

Mr. Belesis and John Thomas Financial were each ordered to pay $500,000.

Mr. Jarkesy, a frequent media commentator and talk show host, led investors to believe that as manager of the funds he was solely responsible for all investment decisions, the SEC said in a statement in March 2013.

Mr. Belesis, in fact, sometimes replaced Mr. Jarkesy in running the funds and funneled money from them to a company he had an interest in, while also “bullying” Mr. Jarkesy into paying substantial, unjustified fees to John Thomas Financial, the SEC said.

The case is Jarkesy v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 14-cv-114, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, (Washington).

(Bloomberg News)

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

Events

Dave O'Brien: Choosing the right tech for a growing practice

When your practice reaches a certain inflection point, technology becomes even more critical. What do you need to take you and your practice to the next level?

Latest news & opinion

10 fastest-growing IBDs

These independent broker-dealers saw the biggest percentage gains in their revenue in 2017.

The unique nature of working with celebrity clients

Athletes and entertainers are just like everyone else — aside from complex tax issues, a lack of financial savvy and a need for prenups

Top 10 IBDs ranked by revenue

These independent broker dealers generated the most revenues in 2017.

8 podcasts advisers listen to when they aren't working

Listening to podcasts for the fun of it.

UBS continues to cut loans to recruits, while increasing compensation to brokers

The wirehouse reduced recruitment loans 20% and increased bonus loans 68% in the first quarter.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print