Ex-John Thomas hedge fund manager loses bid to toss SEC case

George Jarkesy Jr. must face charges of steering bloated fees to the John Thomas Financial brokerage

Jun 11, 2014 @ 10:58 am

Houston hedge-fund manager George Jarkesy Jr. must face a Securities and Exchange Commission case in which he was accused of steering bloated fees to the John Thomas Financial Inc. brokerage.

Mr. Jarkesy lost a bid to throw out the case, an administrative proceeding in which he is accused of defrauding investors.

Mr. Jarkesy and his investment fund management group Patriot28, formerly known as John Thomas Capital Management, argued that they can't get a fair hearing before the SEC. Mr. Jarkesy said the agency has prejudged him as a result of findings in a settlement with John Thomas Financial's founder, Anastasios (Tommy) Belesis.

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington ruled that Mr. Jarkesy has to pursue his claims through an established process that includes hearings before an administrative law judge, SEC commissioners and, finally, a court of appeals.

“To the extent that the plaintiffs believe their cause has been prejudged by the SEC commissioners, they may seek review, if necessary, before the court of appeals, but the statute leaves no room for this court to provide them the relief they seek,” Ms. Howell wrote.

Mark Bierbower, an attorney for Mr. Jarkesy, didn't immediately respond to a phone message yesterday seeking comment on the ruling.

The SEC brought claims against Mr. Jarkesy and Mr. Belesis in March 2013, saying they had defrauded hedge fund investors. Mr. Belesis settled the allegations against him in December by agreeing to be banned from the securities industry. The deal gave him the option of applying for reinstatement after a year.

Mr. Belesis and John Thomas Financial were each ordered to pay $500,000.

Mr. Jarkesy, a frequent media commentator and talk show host, led investors to believe that as manager of the funds he was solely responsible for all investment decisions, the SEC said in a statement in March 2013.

Mr. Belesis, in fact, sometimes replaced Mr. Jarkesy in running the funds and funneled money from them to a company he had an interest in, while also “bullying” Mr. Jarkesy into paying substantial, unjustified fees to John Thomas Financial, the SEC said.

The case is Jarkesy v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 14-cv-114, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, (Washington).

(Bloomberg News)

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

How did we pick this year's 40 under 40 winners?

Special projects editor Liz Skinner and editor Fred Gabriel say efforts to improve the financial advice industry and the promise of future success factored heavily in candidate selection.

Latest news & opinion

Merrill re-evaluates commission ban in retirement accounts

The wirehouse's wealth management group announces a fresh look at the ban now that the DOL rule is on the brink of death.

10 biggest retirement mistakes

Adhere to enrollment deadlines and distribution rules or pay a hefty penalty.

DOL fiduciary rule on brink of death as key deadline passes

Justice Department didn't petition the Supreme Court to rehear the case. A mandate from the 5th Circuit would finally lay the fiduciary rule to rest.

Finra to overhaul broker information system, cut compliance costs for broker-dealers

The move is intended to cut compliance costs for firms as well as make the registration and disclosure process more efficient.

SEC rule proposal doesn't include 401(k) sponsors in 'best interest' advice

Plan sponsors are left out of the equation because they don't appear to fall within the definition of "retail" investor, legal experts say.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print