Ex-John Thomas hedge fund manager loses bid to toss SEC case

George Jarkesy Jr. must face charges of steering bloated fees to the John Thomas Financial brokerage

Jun 11, 2014 @ 10:58 am

+ Zoom
(George Jarkesy's Google+ page)

Houston hedge-fund manager George Jarkesy Jr. must face a Securities and Exchange Commission case in which he was accused of steering bloated fees to the John Thomas Financial Inc. brokerage.

Mr. Jarkesy lost a bid to throw out the case, an administrative proceeding in which he is accused of defrauding investors.

Mr. Jarkesy and his investment fund management group Patriot28, formerly known as John Thomas Capital Management, argued that they can't get a fair hearing before the SEC. Mr. Jarkesy said the agency has prejudged him as a result of findings in a settlement with John Thomas Financial's founder, Anastasios (Tommy) Belesis.

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington ruled that Mr. Jarkesy has to pursue his claims through an established process that includes hearings before an administrative law judge, SEC commissioners and, finally, a court of appeals.

“To the extent that the plaintiffs believe their cause has been prejudged by the SEC commissioners, they may seek review, if necessary, before the court of appeals, but the statute leaves no room for this court to provide them the relief they seek,” Ms. Howell wrote.

Mark Bierbower, an attorney for Mr. Jarkesy, didn't immediately respond to a phone message yesterday seeking comment on the ruling.

The SEC brought claims against Mr. Jarkesy and Mr. Belesis in March 2013, saying they had defrauded hedge fund investors. Mr. Belesis settled the allegations against him in December by agreeing to be banned from the securities industry. The deal gave him the option of applying for reinstatement after a year.

Mr. Belesis and John Thomas Financial were each ordered to pay $500,000.

Mr. Jarkesy, a frequent media commentator and talk show host, led investors to believe that as manager of the funds he was solely responsible for all investment decisions, the SEC said in a statement in March 2013.

Mr. Belesis, in fact, sometimes replaced Mr. Jarkesy in running the funds and funneled money from them to a company he had an interest in, while also “bullying” Mr. Jarkesy into paying substantial, unjustified fees to John Thomas Financial, the SEC said.

The case is Jarkesy v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 14-cv-114, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, (Washington).

(Bloomberg News)

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

Events

Creating client events with a 'wow'

Financial adviser Ryan Furstenau has turned his passion for Dodge Vipers into new clients. Learn about his event and how it has helped him prospect in a small community.

Video Spotlight

The Search for Income

Sponsored by PGIM Investments

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

How does your advisory firm stack up?

Comparing a firm's pay to the competition can point out vast flaws.

10 signs your client is cheating on you

Sure signs that clients may be on the way out the door.

Morgan Stanley sees slower fee-based asset flows on fiduciary rule delay

Flows to advisory accounts, while still higher than the start of 2016, dropped off more than 20% from Q2 and were the lowest in a year.

How adviser salaries stack up to other jobs

Median compensation hovers just under $100,000 on the low end and reaches nearly $300,000 for bosses.

Finra ranking brokers in effort to crack down on industry's bad apples

All 634.403 reps have been ranked based on factors such as prior regulatory disclosures, disciplinary actions and employment history.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print