Joe Duran

Duran Duranblog

Joe Duran

Forget fines, regulators want public scoldings

Fines for bad actions are yesterday's news; today, sanctions come with acknowledgment of guilt and potential for personal liability and loss

Jun 12, 2014 @ 9:45 am

By Joe Duran

sherriff, joe duran, regulator, sec, securities and exchange commission, finra
+ Zoom

The world has changed in many ways, but the inflow of former brokers into adviser roles and the shift in perspective for our nation's regulators are two things you'd best not ignore. Fines for bad actions are yesterday's news; today, sanctions come with acknowledgment of guilt and potential for personal liability and loss.

String 'em up high

For most of our careers, regulators have coerced large financial settlements from institutions that behaved badly; however, there is clearly a shift in the directive for all of these oversight groups. From the Department of Justice to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the top cops are not just correcting bad behavior but setting public examples of bad actors.

Recently, Credit Suisse AG had the pleasure of not just paying over $2 billion in fines for assisting U.S. citizens in avoiding taxes, but also had to acknowledge guilt in its role. In the past, the fine might have been just as large, but there would have been no public acknowledgment of guilt.

A little closer to home, SEC Chairman Mary Jo White gave a speech where she said, “If an enforcement program is to have a strong deterrent effect, it is critical that responsible individuals be charged.” She followed up that the SEC is looking for “ways to innovate in order to further strengthen our ability to charge individuals,” not just the companies that they work for. In an industry where reputation is the biggest asset, I hope this strikes fear in everyone's core. There will be public examples; you can count on it. The pendulum is in full swing and the “tax” of regulation will be higher in our industry, no matter how small you are. I am no attorney, but below I cover some things every adviser should be thinking about, in addition to the obvious items like suitability, being honest and doing all the right things for clients.

Understanding all of the rules — and ensuring your entire firm abides by them — has always been part of the job, but the risk and consequences are higher now than ever before. No matter how small your firm is, a reputational event can shut you down permanently. So what are some of the less obvious areas you should consider?

1. Awareness and disclosure. No. 1 with a bullet is ensuring you are aware of the current rules, are open and communicative about every aspect of your business, and make sure you have documented evidence (that clients are aware of) of what you will do for them, how much it will cost and that they are alert to any and all areas of potential conflict. The knowledge should extend to ensuring all of your employees and folks interacting with clients understand and respect all of the rules. When was the last time you tested the regulatory knowledge of your staff?

2. Risk assessment. The more you do for a client, the more likely you are to have areas of potential conflict and risk. Taking custody, building proprietary products et. al. is a regulatory red flag that will increase scrutiny and make you look more risky to the regulators (no more Madoff situations). Regulators today are going beyond regulatory compliance to ensure you are monitoring all aspects of client risk, from privacy of their information to technology redundancy to balance sheet and key personnel risk. The scope of regulatory protection is wider now than ever — be prepared with internal risk assessment and contingency plans for all major areas of your business. Have you done a risk assessment of your entire business?

3. Demonstrated self-policing. Fewer things display your focus on compliance as an asset than showing that you self-regulate to the highest standards. Showing that you self-audit, catch and correct mistakes, and document and confirm compliance is expensive, but also a good way to ensure you stay out of trouble. What was the last operational or regulatory mistake you captured, fixed and documented?

We work in a glorious industry. We have no machinery, no inventory and no real capital costs. We get to do very important work every day. However, the lines are blurring between securities brokers and fiduciaries (with more brokers than ever becoming “advisers”) and the regulators want to see bad actors held accountable and paying for their misdeeds. This means more folks with less knowledge of the rules are entering the advisory business and the new sheriffs are tougher than ever. Being on the right side of the law is not enough — you need to actively monitor and document that your firm operates to the highest standards. Your reputation and your business are counting on it.

Joe Duran is chief executive of United Capital and the bestselling author of “The Money Code: Improve Your Entire Financial Life Right Now.” Follow him @DuranMoney.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


The client of the future

Your clients of tomorrow want you to stay ahead of the curve with technology. Some of the industry’s top young advisers and thought leaders explain what they think tomorrow’s clients will need.

Video Spotlight

A Teacher’s Lesson Plan

Sponsored by Prudential

Latest news & opinion

Will Jeffrey Gundlach's Trump-like approach on Twitter work in financial services?

The DoubleLine CEO's attacks on Wall Street Journal reporters is igniting a discussion on what's fair game on social media.

Fidelity wins arb case against wine mogul but earns a rebuke from Finra

In the case of investor Peter Deutsch, Fidelity doesn't have to pay any compensation, but regulator said firm put its interests ahead of his.

Plaintiffs win in Tibble vs. Edison 401(k) fee case

After a decade of activity around the lawsuit, including a hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court, judge rules a prudent fiduciary would have invested in institutional shares.

Since banking scandal, Wells Fargo advisers with more than $19.2 billion leave firm

Despite a trying year, the firm has said it will sweeten signing bonuses for veteran advisers.

Is LPL's deal sweet enough for NPH's 3,200 reps and advisers?

They will have to decide if the signing package they are being offered by LPL makes sense. A lot is hanging in the balance.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print