Editorial

Who's Finra protecting, anyway?

If Finra isn't going to live up to its self-professed mission to protect investors, then the SEC should.

Aug 3, 2014 @ 12:01 am

Once again, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. has shown that it is more beholden to the industry it regulates than to the investing public it purports to protect.

The latest proof is Finra's recent request to the Securities and Exchange Commission to delay implementing a proposed rule that would make the pricing of nontraded real estate investment trusts more transparent to investors. Finra had originally recommended the rule take effect six months after the SEC signs off on it. In a letter dated July 11, Finra asked that it not take effect for 18 months after SEC approval.

There's no good reason we can think of for this request. In its letter to the SEC, a Finra attorney asked for more time so broker-dealers who sell nontraded REITs could adjust to the changes.

That might seem understandable — except that Finra proposed this rule nearly three years ago, in September 2011. The industry has had plenty of time to consider these changes and how they will affect business.

The proposed rule change is a good one. It would do away with broker-dealers' current practice of listing the value of nontraded REIT shares on customer account statements at $10 a share for up to 18 months after the sponsor stops raising funds, even though the value of shares from the start is closer to $8.80 a share after commissions and other fees are taken into account.

The broker-dealer and REIT industries believe the rule could initially curtail the sales of nontraded REITs. That's significant, given that $20 billion of nontraded REITs were sold last year, with a similar amount expected to be sold this year. Nontraded REITs are also a high-commission product, which means brokers aren't looking forward to anything that might crimp sales.

But that isn't a good reason to delay this pro-investor rule. If Finra's request is granted and the SEC approves it this month, the earliest the rule would take effect would be February 2016, almost five years after the rule was first proposed.

That's just too long. If Finra is not going to live up to its self-professed mission to protect investors, then the SEC should. Under no circumstances should it acquiesce to Finra's request to push back this rule's implementation.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

INTV

Why broker-dealers are on a roll

Deputy editor Bob Hordt and senior columnist Bruce Kelly discuss last year's bounce-back for IBDs.

Latest news & opinion

Things are looking up: IBDs soared in 2017

With revenue up, interest rates rising and regulation easing, IBDs are soaring.

SEC advice rule may give RIAs leg up over broker-dealers

Experts say advisers will be able to point to their role as fiduciaries as a differentiator in the advice market.

Brokers accept proposed SEC rule on who can call themselves an adviser

Some say the rule will clear up investor confusion, but others say the SEC didn't go far enough.

SEC advice rule: Here's what you need to know

We sifted through the nearly 1,000-page proposal and picked out some of the most important points.

Cadaret Grant acquired by private-equity-backed Atria

75-year-old owner Arthur Grant positions the IBD for the 'next 33 years.'

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print