Fidelity assets flowing to lower-cost trusts

Firm faces pressure to move retirement-plan clients to investment vehicles with dramatically lower fees

Aug 25, 2014 @ 11:39 am

By Trevor Hunnicutt

mutual funds, assets, danoff, collective investment trusts
+ Zoom
(Bloomberg News)

The biggest stock funds at Fidelity Investments, managed by luminaries such as William Danoff and Steven S. Wymer, are logging billions in withdrawals this year.

Unlike competitor Pacific Investment Management Co., the outflows seem to have little to do with lagging performance or tabloid coverage of management spats.

Indeed, their performance is strong. Mr. Wymer, for instance, is dominating 76% of his competitors this year, as of Aug. 22, and his Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a15-year track record that beats the S&P 500 benchmark by more than 250 basis points, according to Morningstar Inc.

Analysts and commentators have speculated that the outflows may suggest that Fidelity has fallen victim to a trend favoring passive investing that has contributed to the Vanguard Group's growing to nearly $3 trillion in assets for the first time. (That firm's mutual and exchange-traded funds have brought in $114 billion this year, more than three times the combined take of its top nine competitors.)

So what's going on?

It may be a trust issue. A collective investment trust, to be exact.

A majority of the nearly $9 billion in assets shown leaving Fidelity's stock funds this year remain with the firm in other investment vehicles, according to company spokesman Charles Keller.

While Mr. Keller declined to provide specifics, Fidelity communications reviewed by InvestmentNews show that $16.9 billion in retirement-plan assets in four top funds have moved or are committed to move to new trusts offered by the company.

The new structure — which faces less strenuous regulatory burdens, offers lower management costs and typically does away with revenue-sharing arrangements — is expected to save participating 401(k) plans money.

On the other hand, it puts a squeeze on the fees Fidelity can charge on the assets.

Fund companies across the industry are being pressed to lower fees in light of the increased availability of low-cost investment solutions and U.S. regulations requiring more transparency around fees in retirement-plan arrangements, according to analysts.

Actively managed funds have lost market share, controlling 64% of assets invested in U.S. stocks, down from 89% 15 years ago, according to Morningstar.

Michael Rawson, a Morningstar analyst, said that's putting pressure on active managers to reduce fees.

“One way for fund managers to retain assets without widely cutting expense ratios and sacrificing the profitability of existing fund assets may be to offer separate accounts at a lower price to institutional investors,” Mr. Rawson wrote in a report earlier this year.

“Fidelity is playing a little bit of catch-up, particularly given the scale of their retirement-services practice,” said Jon Chambers, a managing director of SageView Advisory Group. The registered investment adviser consults on $32 billion in assets and more than 560 retirement plans, including one that made the switch to the Fidelity trust format.

Mr. Chambers said his client is saving 34 basis points, a more than 44% drop, in annual management fees by converting from an institutional-priced version of the Growth Company Fund to the trust. That includes 20 basis points in revenue sharing that were paid by Fidelity's fund management division to its record-keeping division, the administrator for plans that made the switch.

“We have been managing and offering institutional investment products, including commingled pools, for many years,” Fidelity said in a statement. (Commingled pools is an alternate term for collective investment trusts.)

Despite increasing assets, fees paid to record keepers are declining and so is revenue sharing. In 2013. record-keeping fees fell to $80 per year for each participant, on average, compared with $92 in 2012, according to NEPC, an investment consultancy. More than a tenth of plans involve no form of revenue sharing at all. NEPC surveyed 95 plan sponsors representing 1 million plan participants and collected data from record keepers and other third parties.

Declining use of revenue sharing also could make it easier for plan sponsors to ensure that the fees paid are not excessive, advisers say.

0
Comments

How important are fund flows at Fidelity to you and your clients?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

May 31

Conference

Spring Excell—Peak Advisor Alliance

Members of the InvestmentNews Research team will be presenting new adviser benchmarking data and providing strategies that can help accelerate the growth of your business. In this exclusive three-hour workshop, InvestmentNews will... Learn more

Latest news & opinion

Phyllis Borzi says opponents of DOL fiduciary rule face uphill climb to further delay or dilute it

Former assistant Labor secretary who crafted the rule says President Trump won't be able to get rid of it simply because he doesn't like it.

Shrinking talent pool puts strain on advisory firms

Attrition, cuts in training programs and new competition make it difficult to fill job openings

Trump miscues, more cash becoming available will drive summer muni bond rally

As Trump agenda derails, municipal bonds are benefitting from flight to safety as well as a mismatch between bonds maturing and new issues.

Indexed, variable annuity sales slump as DOL fiduciary rule looms

Uncertainty around the rule may be contributing to tentativeness from advisers and distributors.

President Trump signs resolution killing state auto-IRA rule

Five states have vowed to forge ahead with plans to create retirement programs, but the president's actions may slow development in other states.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print