Are changes ahead in the way nontraded REITs are sold?

State regulators seek to protect investors with proposal of recommendations in 33 areas of REIT policy

Aug 27, 2014 @ 11:04 am

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Limits on the amount of money clients could invest in nontraded real estate investment trusts and curbs on paying distributions to investors from REIT offering proceeds are among new rules state securities regulators are considering — moves that could ultimately limit how lucrative they are for advisers who sell them.

The North American Securities Administrators Association Inc. has been circulating to industry regulators and representatives a list of 33 proposed changes to its REIT policy that are designed to better protect investors.

One of the recommendations has to do with limitations on how much of a client's net worth can be invested in nontraded REITs.

“We're looking into a uniform diversification standard, or concentration limit,” said Dan Matthews, a lawyer with the Washington State Securities Division and a member of NASAA's direct-participation-program project group. “With varying standards among states, we believe it would be useful to have a uniform standard.”

States that do limit the amount of a portfolio that can be invested in nontraded REITs tend to use a figure of 10%.

“But what is the appropriate scope?” Mr. Matthews asked. “Is the percentage related to the immediate offering, all REITs or all direct participation programs? Our challenge is to find one standard that all parties can agree to, with our focus being uniformity and investor protection.”

Another of the topics under consideration addresses restrictions on paying distributions from offering proceeds.

Lawrence Solomon, director of investments and financial planning at OptiFour Integrated Wealth Management, said the current practice of paying dividends out of investment capital as projects are ramping up should be curbed.

“It's not a dividend at all,” Mr. Solomon said. “They don't want all of these REITs operating as a Ponzi scheme.”

State regulators are not targeting fees that brokers can charge for selling nontraded REITs, Mr. Matthews said.

“Any effect that brokers might feel is secondary to what we're doing here,” he said. “None of the 33 topics we've set has a direct effect on those percentages.”

But the sale of nontraded REIT shares produces high commissions for advisers, a payout that could curbed by NASAA's initiative. For example, if limits are placed on the percentage of an investor's portfolio that could be invested in nontraded REITs, commission revenues could decline.

NASAA first circulated the list of proposed changes in August of last year. The Wall Street Journal last week was the first to report that NASAA was considering changes to its REIT policy.

State regulators have not yet reached consensus on any formal proposals, Mr. Matthews said, and the panel's timeline for the recommendations is uncertain.

“We're meeting regularly and trying to push on this, but it's difficult to know when it will be proposed — as soon as it's feasibly possible,” he said.

Any future agreed-to proposals would update the policy statement on REITs NASAA adopted in 2007. Individual states would have to adopt their own REIT rules.

“We support guidelines that promote transparency and uniformity for investors and a level playing field for sponsors and broker-dealers,” said Kevin Hogan, president of the Investment Program Association, without getting into specifics on the 33 topics. He did make the point that NASAA is updating previous REIT guidance rather than coming up with a new program.

So why all the attention on these particular products?

“I don't know that nontraded REITs are necessarily a bad product,” said Linda Riefberg, a partner at the law firm Cozen O'Connor and a former chief counsel for enforcement at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. “The question is: Do investors understand what they're dealing with? These products can be managed to be a good component of a portfolio as long as there's good disclosure.”

Peter Maftieu, a compliance consultant and principal at Sound Compliance Services, said REITs are ripe for reform, and Finra, the industry-funded broker regulator, should be doing more to police them.

“These products are not simple; they are complex,” Mr. Maftieu said. “Unfortunately, Finra punted. It shouldn't be left to state regulators.”

Brokers who sell nontraded REITs are monitored both by Finra and by state regulators. Finra has proposed a rule that would make more transparent the costs of purchasing shares of a nontraded REIT.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

May 02


Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


One adviser's story of losing his son to the opioid epidemic

John W. Brower, president and CEO of JW Brower & Associates, shares the story behind his son's death from a heroin overdose and how it inspired him to help others break the cycle of addiction.

Video Spotlight

Help Clients Be Prepared, Not Surprised

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Brace for steepest rate hikes since 2006 in new year

Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase predict average interest rates across advanced economies will climb to at least 1 percent in 2018.

Why private equity wants a piece of the RIA market

Several factors, including consolidation in the independent advice industry and PE's own growing mountain of cash, are fueling the zeal to invest.

Finra bars former UBS rep for private securities transactions

Regulator says Kenneth Tyrrell engaged in undisclosed trades worth $13 million.

Morgan Stanley fires former Congressman Harold Ford for misconduct

Allegations against the wirehouse's former managing director include sexual harassment, which Ford denies.

Senate tax bill changes for pass-throughs more generous than House version, experts say

Senate measure's handling of such small-business income is simpler and makes allowances for more service companies.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print