Finra survey shows investors want more regulatory protection

They're willing to pay a little extra for it, too

Nov 7, 2014 @ 1:04 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

+ Zoom
(Bloomberg News)

Investors want more regulatory protection and are willing to pay higher brokerage costs to get it, a new Finra survey shows.

On Thursday, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., the industry-funded broker-dealer regulator, released a study showing that 92% of investors say it's important to have a “cop on the beat” to protect them from malfeasance in the markets and that 74% support “additional regulatory protections."

More than half (56%) would favor enhanced regulation even if it resulted in “a minimal increase" in costs that brokerage firms pass on to investors. The rest of the study participants split between opposing additional regulation if it meant higher costs (22%) and having no opinion (22%).

The survey appears just weeks before the Dec. 1 deadline for comments on a proposal to implement a customer data collection initiative, the Comprehensive Automated Risk Data System.

Finra has made CARDS a priority since it first proposed the idea in a December 2013 concept release. The regulator argues that the system would let it collect reams of brokerage account information quickly and efficiently, bolstering its ability to detect investment product sales abuses and other harmful market trends.

Critics worry that the cost of CARDS — in technology infrastructure, maintenance and security — would be burdensome for small broker-dealers. It has drawn opposition from Capitol Hill. Finra is conducting a cost-benefit analysis of the CARDS proposal.

Although the results of the study could help make the case for CARDS, that's not the reason Finra conducted it, said George Smaragdis, a Finra spokesman.

“While Finra has previously surveyed investors regarding 'investor literacy' — the understanding ordinary investors have of market principles, instruments, organizations and regulation — we felt it was important to survey investors regarding their attitudes about regulatory protections,” Mr. Smaragdis wrote in an email.

The study was based on an online survey of 1,000 people conducted in October. Participants had to be 21 or older, make household financial decisions and have at least $10,000 in investible assets, although 70% had more than $100,000 in investments.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Stephanie Bogan: What's really holding advisers back from achieving their goals

The only thing holding financial advisers back from accomplishing what they want is the assumptions they're making, according to Stephanie Bogan, founder of Educe Inc.

Latest news & opinion

Advisers get more breathing room to make Form ADV changes

RIAs can enter '0' in some new parts of the document before their annual filing next year.

Since banking scandal, Wells Fargo advisers with more than $19.2 billion leave firm

Despite a trying year, the firm has said it will sweeten signing bonuses for veteran advisers.

Is LPL's deal sweet enough for NPH's 3,200 reps and advisers?

They will have to decide if the signing package they are being offered by LPL makes sense. A lot is hanging in the balance.

Eduardo Repetto to leave Dimensional Fund Advisors

Gerald O'Reilly, currently co-CIO, will take over as co-CEO with David Butler.

Alternative strategies boomed after crisis, but haven't been tested

Because the S&P 500 has outperformed, convincing clients they need protection is a hard sell.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print