Finra fines Pershing $3 million for customer protection rule violations

The clearing and custody unit failed to meet reserve requirements, the regulator said

Dec 29, 2014 @ 11:29 am

By Mason Braswell

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. has fined Pershing $3 million for violating the Customer Protection Rule, which requires a certain level of funds be set aside to protect against broker-dealer misuse or insolvency.

For roughly nine months between 2010 and 2011, Pershing, a unit of Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that serves as a clearing firm for around $1 trillion in assets, failed to set aside as much cash as needed for a reserve account to meet the regulator's deposit requirements, Finra said. The deficiencies, which ranged from $4 million to $220 million, arose from Pershing's “misinterpretation” of certain aspects of the rule and inadequate supervision over how the firm calculated what it needed to set aside, the regulator concluded.

"Clearing firms have a fundamental responsibility to protect customer assets and must ensure that their supervisory systems are compliant with the Customer Protection Rule,” Finra's chief of enforcement, Brad Bennett, said in a statement. “Customers' assets were at risk because Pershing failed to establish systems to vet procedural changes with material impact to the reserve and possession and control positions."

Pershing, based in Jersey City, N.J., ranks as the largest broker-dealer clearing firm as measured by clients, with 811, according to Investment News' database.

Pershing agreed to the sanctions without admitting or denying the findings.

Finra said it discovered the alleged deficiencies during an onsite examination in 2011 and that the firm promptly conducted its own review of its reserve formula computation.

"We are pleased to have amicably resolved this matter," said Pershing spokesman Paul Patella. "The company has enhanced its controls in this important area."


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video


Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Cetera reportedly exploring $1.5 billion sale

The company confirmed it's talking to investment bankers to 'explore how to best optimize [its] capital structure at lower costs.'

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton outlines goals for a new fiduciary standard

Rule should provide clarity on role of adviser, enhanced investor protection and regulatory coordination.

Advisers bemoan LPL's technology platform change

Those in a private LinkedIn chat room were sounding off about fears the independent broker-dealer will require a move to ClientWorks before it is fully ready.

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray with legislation requiring brokers to act in best interests of clients

Legislation requires brokers to act in the best interests of clients.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print