American Funds to get approval to offer ETFs

Massive mutual fund operation could come storming into a popular investment product

Feb 4, 2015 @ 10:43 am

By Trevor Hunnicutt

In a move that could pave the way to a new order in the fund industry, securities regulators plan to approve a proposal by American Funds, the third-largest mutual fund brand, to offer ETFs for the first time.

The decision, announced this week by the Securities and Exchange Commission, clears the way for the manager of $1.2 trillion in mostly broker-sold mutual funds to build its own exchange-traded funds, a product that has most of its assets flowing into products that replicate an index. American Funds is the largest mutual fund manager without a lineup of ETFs.

It remains unclear if American Funds will bring ETFs to market. After the commission staff’s decision was announced late Monday, Tom Joyce, a spokesman for American Funds parent, Capital Group Cos., said the company is “leaving our options open at this point.”

“We continue to have interest in the concept of active ETFs,” Mr. Joyce said. “But, this approval aside, we have no immediate plans to offer ETFs of any kind. This allows us to consider, to explore and to have conversations with the industry participants.”

Still, the company’s active interest — including two proposals filed since July — indicate the seriousness with which mutual fund managers are treating ETFs, once a backwater but now the fastest-growing asset management product, in part because of the growing number of advisers who rely more on fees charged directly to clients than on commission revenues paid by fund houses.

American Funds sells only through financial advisers and brokers, but that’s an increasingly tough business, and the company has had seven straight years of redemptions totaling $261 billion, according to an estimate by Morningstar Inc. Most of those outflows have come in “load” funds, which are sold by financial advisers and brokers who collect commissions from the sale. ETFs provide no such remuneration to the adviser.

“American Funds has gone through a very, very difficult period and have come through it reasonably well,” said one top industry consultant who declined to be named. “They realize they really have to be a full-time participant in the industry. They can’t be above the fray.”

Perhaps ironically, Los Angeles-based Capital Group is partly responsible for the popularity of index-based investing. A Capital subsidiary in the 1960s invented MSCI indexes tracking international markets. While MSCI Inc. is now independent, it retains the “C” in its name, which once stood for “Capital.” In the U.S., an estimated $269 billion in ETF assets track MSCI indexes, according to Morningstar.

Before last year, American Funds maintained that it had little interest in the ETF market, in large part because of holdings transparency.

The filing by American Funds that the SEC is poised to approve would require it to disclose its holdings daily, which has been an insurmountable ask for many managers. It would allow the firm to file for ETFs investing in foreign and domestic stocks and bonds. In its filing, American Funds said its first fund would likely “seek to provide long-term growth of capital, with income as a secondary objective.”

Though the SEC intends to green-light the application, opponents of the proposal can still submit a request for a hearing before the commission. Based on past experience, such a hearing is unlikely.

The agency has relaxed its view on active management in ETFs in recent years. Active funds account for just 1% of the ETF market.

In 2012, regulators reversed a 2-year-old moratorium on derivatives use in the funds, a benefit to existing active ETF managers, including Pacific Investment Management Co.

In December, the SEC approved a request to let a new type of security trade that combines facets of mutual funds and ETFs, marketed as “NextShares” by Eaton Vance Corp. Those funds don’t require immediate portfolio holdings disclosure.

Around the same time, the agency denied and publicly rebuked a version of a proposal backed by fund managers, including Capital Group, for nontransparent actively managed ETFs. The SEC said the mechanics of that proposal could destabilize capital markets. The proposal’s sponsor, Precidian Investments, has refiled with regulators.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

B-D Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' B-D Data Center to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Upcoming Event

Jul 10


Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


Behind the scenes at Pershing Insite 2018

What goes on behind the scenes at one of the industry's biggest conferences? Join us for an all-access sneak peak!

Latest news & opinion

Advisers with billions in AUM leaving Wall Street

Merrill Lynch has seen two teams exit recently, each with more than $4 billion in client assets.

Wells Fargo weighs changes to wealth unit

The move would reflect the bank's effort to cut $4 billion in costs.

Small broker-dealers seek legislative relief from annual audits

Bills introduced in House, Senate would remove PCAOB requirement.

Meet our new 40 Under 40s

For a fifth year, InvestmentNews is proud to shine a spotlight on the amazing accomplishments and potential of top young financial professionals.

Merrill re-evaluates commission ban in retirement accounts

The wirehouse's wealth management group announces a fresh look at the ban now that the DOL rule is on the brink of death.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print