Are robos making clients think that 1% fee is steep?

Study finds 20% of investors strongly agree that the investment advice by advisers isn't worth the cost

Jun 26, 2015 @ 1:27 pm

By Alessandra Malito

When it comes to fees, the sweet spot for advisers tends to be 1%. However, as low-cost automated investment services proliferate, many investors don't agree.

A Greenwald & Associates and GDC Research study that surveyed 1,000 investors found that 20% of respondents strongly agreed that advisers' investment advice was not worth the 1% fee they charged.

There is some good news for advisers, though. Only one in four investors said that they find robo-advice appealing, and many want to communicate with an adviser. Some are simply second-guessing the price of traditional financial advice.

"As the old adage goes, pricing becomes a problem in lieu of value," said Dennis Gallant, president of GDC Research. "There will be more scrutiny … what are they getting for that 1% fee?"

Robo-advisers, which offer automated investment services at a fraction of the fees that advisers charge for their more comprehensive services, are becoming more and more prevalent in the market. The rise in awareness of robo options is the driving force behind many investors' increasing level of fee sensitivity.

Charles Schwab & Co. has launched its own robo platform Schwab Intelligent Portfolios, which is free, and other robos like Wealthfront and Betterment offer services for 25 basis points and 15-to-35 basis points, respectively. All three of those have surpassed $200 million in assets under management and continue to grow.

"I do see an impact when it comes to fees and fee structures because of a heightened awareness of the fact that robos are a lower-cost model," said Matt Lynch, managing partner of Strategy & Resources, a financial services consulting firm.

Tom White, the founder and chief executive of iQuantifi, an online investment platform, said that robos have definitely put pressure on advisers, who may consider lowering the price they charge or changing their fee structure from being based on assets under management.

Mr. White said that all this debate about the value of an adviser is contingent upon the market, though.

“All of this is happening in the midst of a bull market,” Mr. White said. “I would argue during the next bear market, cost is not going to be so much the focus.

“Those that can provide value over and above [benchmark] returns are going to be the winners,” he said.

Mr. Gallant also said that advisers shouldn't look at robos as competitors. He said people will pay a premium price for premium, high-touch service, and that's how advisers can showcase their value.

Jon Ulin, founder of Ulin & Co. Wealth Management in Boca Raton, Fla., said that there are a variety of features that make advisers' work more impactful than online platforms, including measuring risk tolerance, tracking performance in the context of each investor's goals, and providing answers to questions and a supportive relationship when times are hard.

"Sitting down with me and paying 1%, I believe, is as strong as meeting with your doctor or nutritionist," Mr. Ulin said.

Professionals can help benchmark where a person is in the most important areas of his or her life, especially gauging the health of that person's finances.

How an investor wants to manage their investments and the type of relationship they would like to have with an adviser are also crucial in determining whether the 1% fee is worth it.

In a Hartford Funds study of 500 investors, only 32% of respondents valued financial performance more than a good personal relationship with their adviser.

That said, there will always be some investors who prefer only online investment management.

In a recent A.T. Kearney study of 4,000 investors, 4% said they were extremely likely to use robo-advisory services, 10% said they were very likely, 19% said they were likely and 36% said they were somewhat likely. And advisers will need to get in front of investors if they want to work with them.

"This is supply and demand," Mr. Gallant said. "And right now the demand for advice is greater than supply."

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Oct 09

Conference

Diversity & Inclusion Awards

Attend the industry’s first event celebrating diversity and inclusion as well as recognizing those who are leading the financial services profession in this important endeavor. Join InvestmentNews, as we strive to raise awareness, educate... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

How interest rates have affected different types of insurance

Social media and engagement editor Scott Kleinberg and reporter Greg Iacurci discuss a common theme in this week's popular insurance stories.

Latest news & opinion

LPL video about private equity looks like a swipe at Cetera

Recruiting video warns about potential consequences for advisers when a PE firm buys a broker-dealer.

Ladenburg chairman Phillip Frost steps down

The SEC charged Frost with fraud earlier this month.

Wells Fargo plans to cut staff up to 10% within next three years

Bank is struggling to cut spending amid regulatory fines and higher legal costs stemming from scandals.

Universal life insurance lawsuits underscore product risk

Sudden cost increases could cause clients to pay much higher annual premiums — or lapse their policies.

10 least affordable U.S. cities for renters

Based on average salaries and rents, here are the least affordable U.S. cities for renters, according to businessstudent.com.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print