Massachusetts' Galvin fines LPL $250,000 over senior certifications

Firm agrees to pay up to settle charges that some of its brokers were using titles that did not comply with state's senior designation regulations

Jul 14, 2015 @ 10:13 am

By Mason Braswell

LPL Financial Inc. agreed to pay $250,000 to Massachusetts securities regulators to settle charges that its representatives misrepresented their qualifications in working with senior investors.

Massachusetts' top securities cop, William F. Galvin, accused the firm, which has its headquarters in Boston and San Diego, of approving brokers' use of senior-specific titles on business cards that did not comply with the state's senior designation regulations.

“In these days when workers are increasingly having to assume responsibility for their

retirement savings, it is vital that the financial services industry not employ titles that suggest an expertise in advising senior citizens when none exists,” Secretary Galvin said in a statement. “That is why Massachusetts has these rules in place.”

After Mr. Galvin's office discovered one such instance, LPL cooperated with the regulator's investigation and conducted an internal review and uncovered at least 10 brokers who may have been using titles that did not comply with the state's senior designation regulations, according to a statement from the Massachusetts secretary of the commonwealth.

The brokers were not named.

LPL had approved the title on one broker's business card three times, according to the statement.

“Pursuant to the Senior Designations Regulations, use of senior-specific credentials and designations which improperly suggest or imply certification or training beyond that which the titleholder possesses is prohibited,” the settlement stated. “Since June 1, 2007, LPL did not establish, maintain, nor enforce a procedure to review senior-specific titles for compliance with the Senior Designations Regulations in the Commonwealth.”

LPL agreed to a cease and desist order and to review its procedures regarding senior designations.

“LPL has taken steps to implement enhanced review procedures and has agreed to pay a fine of $250,000,” wrote Brett Weinberg, a spokesman for LPL, in an emailed statement.

Last week, Mr. Galvin's office charged another broker-dealer, Securities America Inc., after a broker allegedly used “bait and switch” advertising to market to seniors.

The fine is the latest in a string of regulatory issues that LPL has faced from the state's regulators over failure to supervise claims. In October, LPL paid $541,000 to reimburse seniors after Mr. Galvin accused the firm of failing to properly supervise charges that seniors paid when switching variable annuities.

In December 2012, Mr. Galvin sued LPL over the sales practices of its brokers regarding real estate investment trusts. He charged LPL with failure to supervise registered representatives who sold the nontraded REITs under terms that violated both state limitations and the company's rules.

In June 2014, the firm was hit with a $2 million fine and ordered to pay $820,000 as part of a settlement with the Illinois Securities Department over failing to maintain adequate books and records documenting variable annuity exchanges.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

B-D Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' B-D Data Center to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Featured video

Events

The biggest drivers in wealth management today

What's shaping the future of financial advice? After 10 years of MarketCounsel Summits, Brian Hamburger explains what's changed in the past decade and what stands ahead for adviser technology and regulation.

Video Spotlight

Help Clients Be Prepared, Not Surprised

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Tax update: Brady says sales tax deduction in final bill

Taxpayers will be able to deduct state income taxes or state sales taxes in addition to property levies — up to a $10,000 cap.

Critics say regulation hasn't curbed overly rosy projections for indexed universal life insurance

They say rule didn't go far enough and more stringent measures may be necessary.

Broker, retirement groups make last-minute pleas to change tax legislation

Pass-through provisions are target of groups representing employee-model brokerage firms, as well as retirement plan advisers.

House and Senate reach tentative compromise for tax overhaul

Lawmakers still need to get a cost analysis of their agreement, so it's not yet definite, according to a source.

Advisers' biggest fears for 2018

What keeps advisers up at night.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print