Massachusetts' Galvin fines LPL $250,000 over senior certifications

Firm agrees to pay up to settle charges that some of its brokers were using titles that did not comply with state's senior designation regulations

Jul 14, 2015 @ 10:13 am

By Mason Braswell

LPL Financial Inc. agreed to pay $250,000 to Massachusetts securities regulators to settle charges that its representatives misrepresented their qualifications in working with senior investors.

Massachusetts' top securities cop, William F. Galvin, accused the firm, which has its headquarters in Boston and San Diego, of approving brokers' use of senior-specific titles on business cards that did not comply with the state's senior designation regulations.

“In these days when workers are increasingly having to assume responsibility for their

retirement savings, it is vital that the financial services industry not employ titles that suggest an expertise in advising senior citizens when none exists,” Secretary Galvin said in a statement. “That is why Massachusetts has these rules in place.”

After Mr. Galvin's office discovered one such instance, LPL cooperated with the regulator's investigation and conducted an internal review and uncovered at least 10 brokers who may have been using titles that did not comply with the state's senior designation regulations, according to a statement from the Massachusetts secretary of the commonwealth.

The brokers were not named.

LPL had approved the title on one broker's business card three times, according to the statement.

“Pursuant to the Senior Designations Regulations, use of senior-specific credentials and designations which improperly suggest or imply certification or training beyond that which the titleholder possesses is prohibited,” the settlement stated. “Since June 1, 2007, LPL did not establish, maintain, nor enforce a procedure to review senior-specific titles for compliance with the Senior Designations Regulations in the Commonwealth.”

LPL agreed to a cease and desist order and to review its procedures regarding senior designations.

“LPL has taken steps to implement enhanced review procedures and has agreed to pay a fine of $250,000,” wrote Brett Weinberg, a spokesman for LPL, in an emailed statement.

Last week, Mr. Galvin's office charged another broker-dealer, Securities America Inc., after a broker allegedly used “bait and switch” advertising to market to seniors.

The fine is the latest in a string of regulatory issues that LPL has faced from the state's regulators over failure to supervise claims. In October, LPL paid $541,000 to reimburse seniors after Mr. Galvin accused the firm of failing to properly supervise charges that seniors paid when switching variable annuities.

In December 2012, Mr. Galvin sued LPL over the sales practices of its brokers regarding real estate investment trusts. He charged LPL with failure to supervise registered representatives who sold the nontraded REITs under terms that violated both state limitations and the company's rules.

In June 2014, the firm was hit with a $2 million fine and ordered to pay $820,000 as part of a settlement with the Illinois Securities Department over failing to maintain adequate books and records documenting variable annuity exchanges.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

B-D Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' B-D Data Center to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Featured video

INTV

Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

Gun violence hits investment strategies, sparks political debates with advisers

Screening out weapons companies has limited downside.

Whistleblower said to collect $30 million in JPMorgan case

The bank did not properly disclose that it was steering asset-management customers into investments that would be profitable for JPMorgan Chase.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

If Finra eases firm oversight of outside business activities, broker-dealers could lose revenue

Brokerage firms would no longer be able to charge reps for supervising nonaffiliated RIAs.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print