Subscribe

The science behind why advisory teams do better business

Study finds multiple advisers are more accountable to each other and disciplined than solo advisers, and higher assets and revenue follow.

Planning teams perform better than solo advisers, and it’s not just a matter of two heads being better than one.
Advisers who work together as a pair or even a larger team grow faster than advisers who work alone because they focus on the fundamental drivers that lead to more successful businesses, according to a PriceMetrix report released Tuesday.
“Teams do better because they hold each other accountable about things that cause firms to do best,” said Pat Kennedy, co-founder of PriceMetrix, a practice management software firm. “It’s similar to the benefits of having an exercise buddy.”
Advisers working in teams grew assets about 7.9% a year from 2013 to 2015, compared with 7.1% a year for solo advisers, the report found. Teams grew revenues at a 9.1% rate, compared with solo advisers at 8.3% a year.
PATH TO ACCELERATED GROWTH
“The team is itself the path to accelerated growth,” Mr. Kennedy said. “Teams operate with a little bit more discipline.”
(More: At Edward Jones, it’s still one person, one office)
Advisory teams generate more fee-based business, focus on a narrower segment of clients and have deeper client relationships — all characteristics that drive growth at firms, Mr. Kennedy said.
And advisers increasingly want to be part of teams.
The number of advisers working with clients as a team has jumped 25% over the past three years, with 55% doing so now, according to PriceMetrix data.
STRONG RELATIONSHIPS
Overall, teams of advisers have about 17% more assets invested than solo advisers, and are more likely to have a client’s retirement account — a signal of a strong relationship with the client, Mr. Kennedy said.
(More: The makeup of independent advisory firms has fundamentally changed)
The average team adviser manages about $130 million, compared with $110 million by the typical solo adviser, the report said. Revenue for the average team adviser is $950,000, compared with $830,000 for solos.
Teams of all asset sizes perform better than solos, but the difference is most pronounced for advisers with about $150 million to $200 million in assets. At that size, teams grew 9.3% a year on average compared with 7.3% for solo advisers, the report found.
The report also concludes that teams that include both a male and a female adviser slightly outperform those with just males or females.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Celebration of women fostering diversity in the financial advice profession

Honoring the 2020 and 2019 InvestmentNews Women to Watch for their achievements and dedication to improving the financial advice profession.

Merrill Lynch veteran Michelle Avan dies

Avan recently became SVP and head of global women's and under-represented talent strategy, global human resources for Bank of America.

Finalists for Women in Asset Management Awards announced

More than 100 individuals were named on the short list for awards in 16 categories; the winners will be announced on Sept. 9.

Rethinking advisory fees means figuring out value

Most advisers still charge AUM-based fees, but that's not likely to be the case in 10 years, according to Bob Veres. Some advisers are now experimenting with alternative fee models.

Advisers need focus on growth and relationships, especially now

Business development expert Robyn Crane believes financial advisers need to be taking advantage of this unique time.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print