For some advisers, money not motivating factor to go independent

Advisers choosing models with the most support forgo up to 25% of profits

Jan 27, 2016 @ 2:09 pm

By Liz Skinner

+ Zoom

Wirehouse advisers looking for independence have choices of the type of firms they create or join – independent broker-dealers, existing registered investment advisers or their own RIA. But the option that eliminates the most business worries will require them to surrender up to 25% more of the profits.

Increasingly, advisers are considering quasi-independent businesses where they join a wealth management firm as a part owner or principal of the firm, according to a Cerulli Associates report from last year. These firms allow advisers to run their businesses independently, but provide enhanced operational, compliance and administrative support.

While figures vary, typically the net profit for advisers joining such firms is about 40% to 50%, said Mindy Diamond, president and CEO of Diamond Consultants, an industry recruiting firm.

Advisers who choose to work as a registered representative of an independent broker-dealer will take home about 60% to 65% in the end, she said. At top-performing solo RIA firms, advisers take away 67% of revenue, while all other solo advisers are taking away about 50% of revenue, according to the 2015 InvestmentNews Adviser Compensation and Staffing Study.

But the decision of what model to pursue rarely hinges on payout.

“If you really have entrepreneurial DNA, you likely won't find the quasi-independent models to be independent enough,” Ms. Diamond said.

(More: Advisers seek independence but less often as entrepreneurs)

At the same time, today more advisers are interested in the quasi-independent models “because they have more freedom and flexibility, but they don't have to deal with the minutia” of running a business, she said.

Advisers Lauren Cosulich and Daniela Pedley spent about two years talking with multiple custodians about how it would work for them to leave Barclays and set up their own business. They estimated profits would be in the 60% to 65% range, Ms. Cosulich said. But instead, the pair joined Summit Trail in August.

“We don't have the interest or the skill set to be CEOs of a business, and we didn't want to have to worry about everything from payroll to technology to ordering paper clips,” Ms. Cosulich said. “We wanted to focus on client relationships.”

The benefits of Summit Trail's professional management and investment platform were more important than any difference in profits for them, she said.

“It was never purely a numbers game,” Ms. Cosulich said.

Summit Trail leverages the Dynasty Financial Partners platform, on which gross income of the RIA typically ranges from 65% to 73%, according to Dynasty spokeswoman Sally Cates. Summit Trail then provides additional business resources for the adviser. She declined to offer the exact payout rate Summit Trail gives its advisers.

At Steward Partners, which uses the Raymond James' platform and support services, advisers earn a flat payout of 50%, plus they receive equity in the company, said Jim Gold, president and founding partner of that firm. That equity is based not just on the adviser's book, but on the performance of the entire firm, he pointed out.

For the majority of advisers who want to go independent, the question is not so much about payout as whether they want the complete business infrastructure so they can focus on clients, Mr. Gold said.

“The question is whether they want to run a business or run their book,” he said.

Ms. Diamond agrees, saying the financial difference between these solutions, all of which offer more independence than at wirehouses, is not significant enough to be the most important factor for advisers breaking away.

The decision comes down to just how independent the adviser wants to be.

“Advisers have to ask themselves whether they are jazzed about finding their own office space and hiring staff and dealing with technology decisions and the like, or do they want it all done for them?” she said.

Other options available to advisers seeking more independence include firms like Focus Financial Partners, where firms join Focus and give up a share of their future revenue in exchange for cash and a stake in Focus; and HighTower Advisors, a hybrid broker-dealer and investment adviser.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Does your pay stack up?

The Adviser Research Dashboard

Based on data collected through InvestmentNews' annual adviser research studies, this interactive, customizable tool allows you to view detailed data on compensation, staffing and financial performance practices from across the industry.

Learn more »

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video

Consuelo Mack WealthTrack

Ariel Investments' John Rogers: How to survive difficult markets

Ariel Investments founder, CEO and CIO John Rogers, Jr. discusses how thinking long term, particularly as a value investor, can help boost your confidence when the markets are working against you.

Latest news & opinion

Morgan Stanley says recruiting and attrition have slowed down

If wirehouses can successfully reduce their reliance on signing bonuses to recruit brokers, they could increase profits.

Managed accounts look attractive to 401(k) advisers, but how do you measure performance?

The customization that makes them a good investment option presents a benchmarking challenge.

National Holdings' acquisition of broker-dealer WFG Investments and its 200 advisers called off

Under an alternative plan, WFG's advisers will be relocated to three broker-dealers, including one owned by National Holdings.

House committees ready two assaults on DOL fiduciary rule this week

One is a vote on a bill to kill Labor's rule and replace it with a disclosure-based best-interest standard, while the second is legislation to prevent funding for enforcement of the regulation.

Can Buckley run the house that Bogle built?

Maintaining a lead in a low-margin business brings unprecedented challenges for Vanguard's new CEO.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print