SEC nominations could stall amid partisan warfare over Supreme Court vacancy

Will a prolonged fight over who gets to fill the seat of the late Justice Antonin Scalia impact the confirmation of two Securities and Exchange Commission nominees?

Feb 16, 2016 @ 1:59 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Partisan warfare over filling the Supreme Court vacancy created by the sudden death of Justice Antonin Scalia last Saturday could impact other nominees, including two White House appointments to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Within hours of Mr. Scalia's death, Senate Republicans indicated they would not advance a nomination on a replacement. They said a confirmation vote should be delayed until after the election in November.

“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court justice,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said in a statement Saturday. “Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”

Democrats accused Republicans of shirking their responsibility to keep the nine-member Supreme Court at full strength. They cited examples of the Senate voting on Supreme Court nominations in an election year, such as in 1988 when Justice Anthony Kennedy was approved.

Now the controversy over the nation's highest court could inflict collateral damage on other nominations, such as those to fill two vacancies on the five-member SEC. Last year the White House put forth Republican Hester Peirce and Democrat Lisa Fairfax for slots that opened up with the departures of Republican Daniel Gallagher and Democrat Luis Aguilar.

“Senate Democrats will attempt to make political hay out of any nomination that is moved by the Republican majority until hearings are scheduled on the president's Supreme Court appointment,” Jason Rosenstock, a partner at the government-relations consultant Thorn Run Partners, wrote in an email.

“Ironically, this only further serves to slow down the impetus to moving anyone, including SEC or federal nominees, through the process, and thus creating a wicked negative feedback loop,” he said.

A spokesman for Sen. McConnell pointed to language in the majority leader's statement that specifies he wants to stop only the Supreme Court nomination, not other appointments. But picking and choosing which nominees get consideration could prove to be fodder for retaliatory blockages in a partisan Congress.

A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., was not immediately available for comment.

Others believe the SEC nominees should be able to stay out of the fray over the Supreme Court seat.

“In this case, you have two qualified nominees — one is a Republican, one is a Democrat,” said Duane Thompson, senior policy analyst at Fi360, a fiduciary-duty consulting firm. “You have parity there. You're not going to upset the balance at the SEC.”

It's not clear when the nomination process for Ms. Peirce and Ms. Fairfax will begin. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala., told Politico in January he didn't anticipate moving nominees until after his March 1 primary. A committee spokesperson was not immediately available for comment.

In the meantime, the SEC will operate with three members: Chairwoman Mary Jo White, an independent appointed by Mr. Obama, Democrat Kara Stein and Republican Michael Piwowar.

Although the SEC staff will continue to work on a uniform fiduciary rule for retail investment advice and on a regulation allowing third-party exams of investment advisers, Mr. Thompson doesn't anticipate that a three-member SEC will take controversial votes.

“You would think Chair White would wait for [Ms. Peirce and Ms. Fairfax] to get on board and participate in the process,” Mr. Thompson said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Diversity & Inclusion Awards: 2018 nominations are open

Editor Fred Gabriel and special projects editor Liz Skinner discuss the nomination process for InvestmentNews' inaugural Diversity & Inclusion awards.

Latest news & opinion

Broker protocol: Indecision over recruiting agreement is rampant

Ruckus over recruiting agreement has even wirehouse lifers wondering if it's time

Cetera reportedly exploring $1.5 billion sale

The company confirmed it's talking to investment bankers to 'explore how to best optimize [its] capital structure at lower costs.'

Advisers bemoan LPL's technology platform change

Those in a private LinkedIn chat room were sounding off about fears the independent broker-dealer will require a move to ClientWorks before it is fully ready.

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray with legislation requiring brokers to act in best interests of clients

Legislation requires brokers to act in the best interests of clients.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print