SEC nominations could stall amid partisan warfare over Supreme Court vacancy

Will a prolonged fight over who gets to fill the seat of the late Justice Antonin Scalia impact the confirmation of two Securities and Exchange Commission nominees?

Feb 16, 2016 @ 1:59 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

+ Zoom

Partisan warfare over filling the Supreme Court vacancy created by the sudden death of Justice Antonin Scalia last Saturday could impact other nominees, including two White House appointments to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Within hours of Mr. Scalia's death, Senate Republicans indicated they would not advance a nomination on a replacement. They said a confirmation vote should be delayed until after the election in November.

“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court justice,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said in a statement Saturday. “Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”

Democrats accused Republicans of shirking their responsibility to keep the nine-member Supreme Court at full strength. They cited examples of the Senate voting on Supreme Court nominations in an election year, such as in 1988 when Justice Anthony Kennedy was approved.

Now the controversy over the nation's highest court could inflict collateral damage on other nominations, such as those to fill two vacancies on the five-member SEC. Last year the White House put forth Republican Hester Peirce and Democrat Lisa Fairfax for slots that opened up with the departures of Republican Daniel Gallagher and Democrat Luis Aguilar.

“Senate Democrats will attempt to make political hay out of any nomination that is moved by the Republican majority until hearings are scheduled on the president's Supreme Court appointment,” Jason Rosenstock, a partner at the government-relations consultant Thorn Run Partners, wrote in an email.

“Ironically, this only further serves to slow down the impetus to moving anyone, including SEC or federal nominees, through the process, and thus creating a wicked negative feedback loop,” he said.

A spokesman for Sen. McConnell pointed to language in the majority leader's statement that specifies he wants to stop only the Supreme Court nomination, not other appointments. But picking and choosing which nominees get consideration could prove to be fodder for retaliatory blockages in a partisan Congress.

A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., was not immediately available for comment.

Others believe the SEC nominees should be able to stay out of the fray over the Supreme Court seat.

“In this case, you have two qualified nominees — one is a Republican, one is a Democrat,” said Duane Thompson, senior policy analyst at Fi360, a fiduciary-duty consulting firm. “You have parity there. You're not going to upset the balance at the SEC.”

It's not clear when the nomination process for Ms. Peirce and Ms. Fairfax will begin. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala., told Politico in January he didn't anticipate moving nominees until after his March 1 primary. A committee spokesperson was not immediately available for comment.

In the meantime, the SEC will operate with three members: Chairwoman Mary Jo White, an independent appointed by Mr. Obama, Democrat Kara Stein and Republican Michael Piwowar.

Although the SEC staff will continue to work on a uniform fiduciary rule for retail investment advice and on a regulation allowing third-party exams of investment advisers, Mr. Thompson doesn't anticipate that a three-member SEC will take controversial votes.

“You would think Chair White would wait for [Ms. Peirce and Ms. Fairfax] to get on board and participate in the process,” Mr. Thompson said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Sep 26

Webcast

Investing 2017: Industry at a Crossroads

The advice industry is at a unique inflection point, as the way clients are investing has changed dramatically: Technology has evolved, access to innovative products has changed, and the active vs. passive debate continues to rage on. Advisers... Learn more

Featured video

Consuelo Mack WealthTrack

Robert Kleinschmidt: How the markets have changed in the age of Trump

When Donald J. Trump was elected president, it changed investors' outlook and generated new market momentum, according to Robert Kleinschmidt, president and CEO of Tocqueville Asset Management. But can the market continue to go up?

Video Spotlight

Are Your Clients Prepared For Market Downturns?

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Jerry Schlichter's fee lawsuits have left an indelible mark on the 401(k) industry

After a decade of litigation, fees are lower and retirement plans are more transparent. But have the lawsuits gone too far?

10 best financial adviser jokes

How many financial advisers does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

With margins crashing, broker-dealers look to merge: report

Increased regulation is straining profit margins among broker-dealers, sending many of them into the arms of their bigger brethren.

Hackers may have profited from SEC breach

The hack of the agency's Edgar filing system occurred in 2016, but the regulator didn't conclude until last month that the cybercriminals may have used their bounty to make illicit trades.

Top 10 financial firms ranked by investor satisfaction

Find out which firm took the top slot for overall investor satisfaction for the second year in a row.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print