MetLife is second major insurer to exit the brokerage business, in the sale of adviser unit to MassMutual

Mergers may increase even more among brokerage firms due to the Labor Department's proposed fiduciary rule

Feb 29, 2016 @ 2:33 pm

By Christine Idzelis

+ Zoom

A second major insurance company has decided to exit the brokerage business this year as MetLife Inc. announced Monday it is selling its U.S. adviser unit to Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.

The sale includes the firm's Premier Client Group, consisting of about 4,000 advisers across the U.S. who sell insurance, annuities and other investment products such as mutual funds, plus its broker-dealer MetLife Securities Inc., according to the company's announcement.

MetLife is shedding the unit as brokerage firms face higher compliance costs tied to the Labor Department's proposed fiduciary rule requiring advisers to act in the best interest of their clients when providing investment services for retirement accounts.

Last month, American International Group Inc.'s CEO Peter Hancock cited the Department of Labor's proposed fiduciary rule as part of its decision to sell its broker-dealer unit to private-equity firm Lightyear Capital and Canadian pension manager PSP Investments.

It can be challenging for insurers to turn wealth management services stemming from securities sales into a lucrative revenue stream, according to Ron Edde, co-founder and CEO of recruitment firm Millennium Career Advisors.

“I think they found it was a lot harder to make money in that space than they thought it would,” said Mr. Edde, who's based in San Diego, Calif. It's difficult recruiting “top talent to an insurance first, securities second, type of firm.”

Advisers at insurers tend toward mid-market clients, while traditional brokers employed by wirehouses and independent brokerage firms typically focus on higher net worth clients and don't view insurance products as core to their financial advice, according to Mr. Edde.

A wave of merger activity is expected to continue because of the new DOL fiduciary rule, which is currently being reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.

Economies of scale gained through an acquisition can help bring down related costs for firms choosing to keep their brokerage business.

“We're going to need to make the investment in compliance and back office,” Michael Fanning, executive vice president of MassMutual's U.S. Insurance Group, said in a phone interview. He said that the deal with MetLife will allow it to spread regulatory costs out over 9,600 advisers versus about 5,600 currently.

“Clearly this gives us scale,” he said, adding that the fiduciary rule is expected to prompt a “tremendous amount of merger activity.”

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

B-D Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' B-D Data Center to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Featured video

Events

Amy Florian: Issues with elder abuse and diminished capacity

As clients age, they become increasingly susceptible to diminished capacity and/or elder abuse. Amy Florian of Corgenius explains the nature and causes of diminished capacity and the signs to watch for.

Latest news & opinion

Retirement planning for women

Longer lifespans and lower savings require creative income strategies.

Sean Spicer resigns as press secretary after Anthony Scaramucci is appointed communications director

Scaramucci is known as an ardent foe of the DOL fiduciary rule, having said during the campaign that Trump would repeal it .

Redoing the math on a 4% retirement withdrawal rate

Given the current interest-rate environment and other factors, advisers disagree about whether the number is too conservative or not conservative enough.

House panel passes bill to replace DOL fiduciary rule with one requiring disclosure of conflicts

Measure likely to continue in partisan advance in House, but could stall in Senate.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print