Subscribe

Broker-dealer to pay $225,000 for mutual fund sales violations

PNC Investments didn't waive sales charges in some funds, and didn't have adequate supervisory procedures in place to catch the lapses, Finra said.

PNC Investments, a broker-dealer and registered investment advisory arm of PNC Financial Services Group Inc., has agreed to pay restitution of almost $225,000 for overcharging retirement clients in connection with mutual fund purchases.
Since at least July 2009, PNC Investments failed to apply waivers for investors in some Class A share mutual funds, even though a waiver of front-end sales charges in the funds was available to eligible customers and disclosed in fund prospectuses, according to a disciplinary action document signed Apr. 11 by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.’s Department of Enforcement.
Rather, PNC Investments, which has approximately 2,300 registered representatives, sold these customers Class A shares with a front-end load or Class B or C shares with a back-end load and higher ongoing fees and expenses, “causing such customers to pay higher fees than they were actually required to pay,” the document said.
As a result, PNC Investments overcharged 121 customer accounts by approximately $191,740 for mutual fund purchases, estimated to total $224,750 including interest, which PNC Investments has agreed to pay in restitution to eligible investors, according to Finra.
The lapses were self-reported by PNC Investments following a review the broker-dealer conducted in July 2015 to determine if PNC Investments was providing available sales waivers.
PNC Investments also had supervisory lapses, according to Finra, for failing to maintain “adequate written policies or procedures” to help financial advisers determine when to apply sales waivers. PNC Investments also failed to adequately notify advisers when waivers were available, and didn’t adopt adequate controls to detect instances when sales waivers weren’t applied during a mutual fund purchase, Finra said.
A PNC spokeswoman declined to comment, citing the firm’s policy not to comment on legal or regulatory matters.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

SEC issues FAQs on investment advice rule

The agency published answers to four questions about Form CRS.

SEC proposes tougher sales rule for exchange-traded products

The agency, concerned about consumer protection, says clients need a baseline understanding of product risk

Pete Buttigieg proposes a ‘public’ 401(k) program

The proposal is similar to others seeking to improve access to workplace retirement plans but would require an employer match.

DOL digital 401(k) rule not digital enough, industry says

Some stakeholders say the disclosure proposal is still paper-centric and should take into account newer technologies.

Five brokers lose Ohio National lawsuit over annuity commissions

Judge rules the brokers weren't beneficiaries of the selling agreement between the insurer and broker-dealers.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print