Broker-dealers could see higher share of fixed indexed annuity sales thanks to DOL fiduciary rule

Selling through independent insurance agents, currently the largest distribution channel for FIAs, will expose insurers to more liability than they may care for

May 5, 2016 @ 1:35 pm

By Greg Iacurci

The sale of fixed indexed annuities through independent insurance agents, by far the largest source of FIA distribution, is likely to take a hard hit as a result of the Labor Department's fiduciary rule, and some believe insurers may lean more on other channels such as broker-dealers and banks in this eventuality.

Executives of major fixed-indexed-annuity product manufacturers have expressed in recent days how the regulation, which raises investment advice standards for retirement accounts, exposes insurers to more liability when distributing through independent agents as compared to broker-dealers and banks.

“There are numerous obstacles in the Best Interest Contract Exemption for our independent agent distribution channel,” John Matovina, chief executive of American Equity Investment Life Holding, the No. 2 seller of indexed annuities in 2015, said during the company's first-quarter earnings call. “And in our view, the BICE was not drafted to be workable for independent agent distribution of fixed indexed annuities.”

The BICE is a component of the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule that exposes affected parties to greater compliance and litigation risk. The DOL released the final version of its rule April 6.

“Thinking in terms of [the] broker-dealer channel, our view there is, there is a smaller threat to the sale of fixed indexed annuities,” Mr. Matovina said.

(More: Coverage of the DOL rule from every angle)

Craig Lindner, co-chief executive of American Financial Group Inc., and Alain Karaoglan, chief executive of retirement and investment solutions at Voya Financial Inc., expressed similar opinions during their respective firms' first-quarter earnings calls. Great American Insurance Group, a subsidiary of American Financial, was the No. 3 seller of FIAs in 2015, and Voya was among the top 15.

“We have by far the greatest impact as it's written today on the IMOs [independent marketing organizations] that have life-only agents,” Mr. Lindner said. “I think there is going to be an adjustment period for banks, for broker-dealers, for registered investment advisers, but I think they're going to figure out how to deal with the new regs. So I think the impact is going to be significantly lower.”

The issue is that the BICE, as it's currently written, doesn't quite work for distribution of fixed indexed annuities through independent insurance agents, according to Steven Schwartz, an insurance analyst at Raymond James & Associates.

That will have a significant impact on distribution because independent marketing organizations — also known as field marketing organizations, which market insurance products to independent agents — “are still the major distribution channel for these products,” he said.

Around six in 10 indexed annuities sold in the fourth quarter of 2015 were via independent agents, with the majority of that percentage via qualified retirement accounts, according to Wink Inc., a market research firm that tracks fixed indexed annuity data.

The BICE allows for the sale of products on a commission basis if certain parameters are met, one of which is the financial institution and investor enter into a contract saying advice is in the investor's best interest. While the DOL's definition of “financial institution” includes such institutions as banks, insurance companies and broker-dealers, independent marketing organizations do not qualify.

That means insurance companies, not the IMO, would have to sign the contract with a policyholder, and therefore be legally liable under the BICE for a recommendation made by an independent agent.

While broker-dealers have the ability to determine if their representatives sell a product in the best interest of the client, and prohibit a sale that's deemed not to be in the best interest, insurance companies can't monitor independent agents in the same manner to deem if a specific annuity is ultimately in a client's best interest, Mr. Schwartz said.

“How in the world, if I'm the insurance company, can I protect myself from legal liability? I can't,” Mr. Schwartz said.

Mr. Matovina of American Equity underscored the severity of the distribution conundrum.

“We see the obligations for oversight of agents there perhaps creating legal exposure that we're very likely not interested in,” he said.

One potential effect is an attempt to grow distribution through banks and broker-dealers, Mr. Schwartz said. Banks represented nearly 17% of sales in the fourth quarter last year, and independent broker-dealers had a 13.5% share, according to Wink.

Sales through those channels have been up even prior to the DOL rule — banks saw a 30% year-on-year increase in 2015, and independent B-Ds had 6% growth, according to Limra, an insurance trade group. These channels have historically favored variable annuities, but have warmed to FIAs in the last few years.

The DOL hasn't made it impossible for IMOs to enter into a best-interest contract, either — they must submit an application to the DOL for an individual exemption. IMOs could also opt to establish a broker-dealer or RIA, and thereby fall under the definition of a “financial institution” for purposes of the BICE. Indeed, that's something large IMOs have already, Mr. Schwartz said.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

Gun violence hits investment strategies, sparks political debates with advisers

Screening out weapons companies has limited downside.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

If Finra eases firm oversight of outside business activities, broker-dealers could lose revenue

Brokerage firms would no longer be able to charge reps for supervising nonaffiliated RIAs.

Galvin charges Scottrade with DOL fiduciary rule violations

Action of Massachusetts' top regulator shows states can put teeth into a rule under review by the Trump administration.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print