Excessive-fee suit targeting $9 million 401(k) plan could be 'harbinger' for industry

Lawsuit is perhaps the first example targeting small retirement plans

May 23, 2016 @ 11:39 am

By Greg Iacurci

A new class-action lawsuit targeting excessive 401(k) fees in a $9 million plan could herald a new frontier of sorts in this type of litigation.

The suit, Damberg et al v. LaMettry's Collision Inc. et al, alleges plan fiduciaries breached their duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 for allowing excessive fees to be charged for investments and record keeping and administration.

Defendants, including the president and chief financial officer of Minnesota-based LaMettry's, didn't engage in a prudent process to evaluate service providers and assess reasonableness of fees, the complaint said. That ultimately resulted in plan participants overpaying hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to the suit, filed May 18 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.

A request for comment from Joanne LaMettry, the firm's president, was not returned by press time. Madia Law is representing the plaintiffs.

Whereas excessive-fee suits have traditionally targeted mega-sized defined contribution plans with billions of dollars, the LaMettry's 401(k) plan is significantly smaller — it had $9.2 million in assets and 114 active participants as of 2014.

This suit could mean small- and mid-sized 401(k) plans — where the bulk of retirement plan advisers operate — are now coming into the crosshairs of the plaintiff's bar, said Marcia Wagner, principal of The Wagner Law Group.

“If this case is the harbinger of something else, I think it's very significant for the industry,” she said, adding that the LaMettry's plan is the smallest plan “by multiples” that she has seen sued for excessive 401(k) fees.

“This may well be a test case,” Ms. Wagner said.

Litigation involving 401(k) plans has ramped up since the end of last year, with some attorneys noting this has been the most active period for new suits in recent memory. Indeed, another excessive-fee suit, against M&T Bank Corp., which has a nearly $2 billion plan, was filed earlier this month.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

INTV

Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

Gun violence hits investment strategies, sparks political debates with advisers

Screening out weapons companies has limited downside.

Whistleblower said to collect $30 million in JPMorgan case

The bank did not properly disclose that it was steering asset-management customers into investments that would be profitable for JPMorgan Chase.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

If Finra eases firm oversight of outside business activities, broker-dealers could lose revenue

Brokerage firms would no longer be able to charge reps for supervising nonaffiliated RIAs.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print