Litigation schedule set for suits against DOL fiduciary rule

The plaintiffs and Labor Department are seeking summary judgment for the cases in a Dallas federal court, with a decision possible in October

Jun 27, 2016 @ 4:31 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Financial industry trade groups and the Department of Labor have agreed to a litigation schedule that could render a decision in October on several lawsuits seeking to stop an investment advice regulation.

The plaintiffs and the DOL are seeking summary judgment for the cases in a Dallas federal court. Briefs would be filed at various dates in July, August, September and into the middle of October.

“The parties agree that the cases should be decided expeditiously on cross-motions for summary judgment without discovery or any other evidentiary proceedings,” a June 24 joint motion states.

The plaintiffs' opinion continued: “There is good cause for the expeditious resolution of this litigation. Among other things, plaintiffs and/or many of their members will incur significant costs and challenges in endeavoring to comply with the Department's rulemaking by April 2017 (the applicability date for most provisions of the rule).”

(More: Everything you need to know about the DOL fiduciary rule as it develops)

Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn has not yet ruled on the motion.

In a separate order on June 21, Ms. Lynn consolidated three suits that were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

One of them involves nine co-plaintiffs, including the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, the Financial Services Institute and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Another one was filed by the American Council of Life Insurers and the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors. A third was filed by the Indexed Annuity Leadership Council.

Two other suits are also in the court system. One was filed in the Washington, D.C., federal court by the National Association of Fixed Annuities. The other was filed in the Kansas district court by Market Synergy Group.A hearing on summary judgment in the NAFA litigation has been set for Aug. 25.

Each of the suits aims to kill the DOL rule, which was finalized in April and requires financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients in retirement accounts.

The plaintiffs argue the rule would significantly raise regulatory costs and legal risks for financial advisers and make advice too expensive for investors with modest assets.

The Obama administration asserts that the rule will protect workers and retirees from conflicted advice that results in the sale of high-fee investments that erode savings.

In a June 22 appearance at the National Press Club in Washington, Labor Secretary Thomas Perez expressed confidence that the regulation will withstand the court challenges.

(Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that Judge Lynn had already granted the joint motion.)

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

What's the first thing advisers should do when they get home from a conference?

After attending a financial services conference, advisers can be overwhelmed by options, choices and tools. What's the first thing they should do when they get back to their office?

Latest news & opinion

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray with legislation requiring brokers to act in best interests of clients

Legislation requires brokers to act in the best interests of clients.

8 apps advisers love for getting stuff done

Smartphone apps that advisers are using in 2018 to run their business more efficiently.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print