Brokerage groups' higher spending on lobbying doesn't kill DOL fiduciary rule

Despite heavily outspending investment adviser groups on lobbying lawmakers in the second quarter, industry trade associations didn't succeed in a key goal

Jul 25, 2016 @ 1:39 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Trade associations representing the brokerage and insurance industries once again heavily outspent investment adviser groups on lobbying lawmakers in the second quarter, but the advantage hasn't succeeded in killing a Labor Department investment advice regulation.

Organizations that have most stridently opposed the measure, which would raise advice standards for retirement accounts, have also spent the most heavily on Capitol Hill outreach.

Despite the House Appropriations Committee's recent approval of a DOL spending bill with a rider to prevent from the agency from enforcing the rule, lawmakers' efforts to squelch it have failed.

Two resolutions that would have halted the ruled failed to achieve supermajorities to overcome President Barack Obama's veto.

“This is an example of an executive agency not listening to lobbyists as much,” said Jeff Yamada, a wealth counselor at MCS Family Wealth Advisors.

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association spent $1.6 million in the second quarter for a total of $3.2 million through the first half of the year, according to records filed with the Office of the House Clerk. The Investment Company Institute and the American Council of Life Insurers each spent $1.2 million in the second quarter, and $2.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for the year so far.

The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors spent $568,000 in the second quarter and $1.1 million for the year. Two other DOL fiduciary-rule critics: the Financial Services Institute spent $180,000 in the second quarter ($360,000 for the year), while the Insured Retirement Institute spent $70,000 in the second quarter ($160,000).

The biggest spender of the groups in favor of the DOL rule was AARP, with $2.1 million spent in the second quarter and $3.9 million for the year. Of course, the retirement advocacy group's lobbying encompasses a much wider swath of issues than financial industry concerns.

Lobby amount, 2016 Q2
  • View 2016
  • View total
Source: Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives

Lobbying outlays by groups representing investment advisers was modest. The Investment Adviser Association spent $40,000 in the second quarter and $80,000 in the first half of the year, while the Financial Planning Coalition spent $10,000 ($20,000). The Financial Planning Association, which is part of the FPC, spent $15,000 in the first quarter, but didn't make a second-quarter filing.

Each of the trade organizations, especially the larger ones, lobby on a range of issues beyond the DOL rule.

Still, the disparity of spending worries Mr. Yamada. He conducted his own study of lobbying against the DOL rule in the third quarter of 2015. His compiled statistics, which included spending by individual firms, found that those in opposition outspent DOL supporters by $50 million to $5 million.

“You're paying for access to improve your bottom line,” Mr. Yamada said. “The brokerage industry is spending a lot to defeat the DOL rule. That's in their best interest, but not in the best interest of consumers.”

The trade groups opposing the DOL measure say they are representing the views of their members, who maintain that the rule would significantly increase regulatory costs and liability risk and make giving and receiving advice sharply more expensive. Many of them also have filed lawsuits to stop the rule.

The effort to influence lawmakers is important on an issue like the DOL rule because so few people understand it, said Mario Nardone, president of East Bay Financial Services.

“It's frustrating to see organizations fighting to keep an uneven playing field … especially on an issue that a lot of Americans are in the dark about,” Mr. Nardone said.

Advisers should try to put themselves in front of their members of Congress and senators to make their policy case, according to Mr. Yamada, a former president of the FPA of Central Oklahoma.

The FPA and other adviser groups sponsor Capitol Hill lobbying days.

“Any time you step into a congressional office and say you're a constituent, that's effective — at least as effective as lobbying money,” Mr. Yamada said.

Regulators also invest in lobbying. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., the industry-funded broker regulator, spent $150,000 in the first quarter ($340,000 through the first half of the year). It did not lobby on the DOL rule.

The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board spent $10,000 lobbying in the second quarter and $20,000 so far this year.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Jul 10


Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


How did we pick this year's 40 under 40 winners?

Special projects editor Liz Skinner and editor Fred Gabriel say efforts to improve the financial advice industry and the promise of future success factored heavily in candidate selection.

Latest news & opinion

Merrill re-evaluates commission ban in retirement accounts

The wirehouse's wealth management group announces a fresh look at the ban now that the DOL rule is on the brink of death.

10 biggest retirement mistakes

Adhere to enrollment deadlines and distribution rules or pay a hefty penalty.

DOL fiduciary rule on brink of death as key deadline passes

Justice Department didn't petition the Supreme Court to rehear the case. A mandate from the 5th Circuit would finally lay the fiduciary rule to rest.

Finra to overhaul broker information system, cut compliance costs for broker-dealers

The move is intended to cut compliance costs for firms as well as make the registration and disclosure process more efficient.

SEC rule proposal doesn't include 401(k) sponsors in 'best interest' advice

Plan sponsors are left out of the equation because they don't appear to fall within the definition of "retail" investor, legal experts say.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print