Subscribe

Emory University sued in latest fiduciary-breach suit

The lawsuit alleges the university and a university-affiliated health system breached their fiduciary duties by causing participants in their 403(b) plans to pay excessive fees.

Emory University in Atlanta is the latest university to be sued over alleged fiduciary breaches in the management of its defined contribution plans.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday by law firm Schlichter, Bogard & Denton in U.S. District Court in Atlanta, alleges Emory University and Emory Healthcare, a university-affiliated health system, breached their fiduciary duties by causing participants in their 403(b) plans to pay excessive record-keeping, administrative and investment management fees, and by retaining high-cost and poor-performing investment options. Also listed as defendants are Emory Pension Board, Emory Investment Management and Mary. L. Cahill, vice president of investments and chief investment officer at Emory University.
The allegations echo those brought against the 403(b) plans of New York University, Yale University, Duke University, Johns Hopkins University,University of Pennsylvania and Vanderbilt University, and against a 401(k) plan of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology last week. All the lawsuits were filed by Schlichter, Bogard & Denton on behalf of more than 100,000 participants combined.
As of Dec. 31, 2014, the Emory University Retirement Plan and the Emory Healthcare Inc. Retirement Savings and Matching Plan had $2.6 billion and $1.1 billion in assets, respectively.
As of the same date, the plans’ lineups contained the same 111 investment options, with TIAA-CREF, Vanguard Group and Fidelity as record keepers. Among other charges, the lawsuit alleges that having multiple record keepers is inefficient and costly, and that many of the investment options were similar and offered at high-cost share classes when lower-cost share classes were available.
” Emory University and Emory Healthcare Inc. value their faculty and staff and provide valuable benefits to them,” said university spokeswoman Elaine Justice in an e-mail. “Through our retirement programs, we offer access to a range of investment options to provide flexibility in meeting individual needs and retirement goals. We are committed to these principles and operate our retirement programs in accord with federal law.”

Meaghan Kilroy is an online reporter at sister publication Pensions & Investments.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Illinois governor proposes making Secure Choice retirement program optional for employers

State treasurer blasts move, vows to work with legislature to override action.

Participants’ personal debt gains attention

Sponsors see debt as major hurdle curbing retirement readiness.

Target-date-fund fees fall for ninth consecutive year

Nearly 95% of net TDF inflows in 2017 went to passive series, Morningstar says.

Pension plans take lead on finding missing participants

The Labor Department's more aggressive stance has made the tasks of finding missing retirement plan participants more demanding.

U.S. target-date funds have strong home-country equity bias

Mercer survey of 68 TDF series finds assets grew 30.8% in 2017.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print