Charles Schwab fires latest salvo in low-cost TDF war

The firm's new target-date mutual funds beat out Fidelity and Vanguard funds in price by two basis points

Aug 25, 2016 @ 8:00 am

By Greg Iacurci

Charles Schwab Corp. has upped the ante in the push to be the lowest-cost provider of target-date retirement funds, launching a new series of target-dated mutual funds on Thursday that edge out Vanguard Group and Fidelity Investments to claim the title as cheapest on the market to date.

The new Schwab Target Index Funds, a passively managed TDF suite built with underlying exchange-traded funds, cost eight basis points and don't have asset minimums, meaning defined-contribution plans of any size can invest in them.

Schwab, one of the fastest-growing ETF providers, is also offering a retail share class for individual investors with a price tag of 13 basis points.

“Fees are a focal point for some target-date managers in terms of being competitive,” said Jeff Holt, a multi-asset analyst at Morningstar Inc.

The stakes are high for asset managers. Cerulli Associates, a research firm, projects TDFs will capture 90% of new contributions to 401(k) plans by the end of the decade, as participants are automatically enrolled into the multi-asset funds at ever-higher rates and embrace a hands-off approach to retirement investing.

Vanguard and Fidelity, the No. 1 and 2 target-date mutual fund providers, respectively, held the lowest-cost title prior to the launch of Schwab's new series — the Fidelity Freedom Index and Vanguard Institutional Target Retirement funds, both passively managed series, cost 10 basis points, according to Morningstar.

Beyond Vanguard and Fidelity, firms such as BlackRock Inc., State Street Global Advisors and TIAA have also been among the lowest-cost providers of target-date mutual funds on the market, according to Mr. Holt.

“The lowest keeps changing,” Mr. Holt said, describing the low-cost war as an ongoing game of “leap frog.”

The Target Index Funds adds to three other target-date series Schwab has on the market: a passively managed collective investment trust series and an active-passive blend in both mutual funds and CITs.

'LASER FOCUS'

The new mutual funds, at eight basis points, tie the price of its passive CITs, the Schwab Indexed Retirement Trust Funds. They beat its existing mutual fund series, the Schwab Target Funds, in price by at least 40 basis points. (The Target Funds range in cost from 48 to 82 basis points, the cheapest being the most bond-heavy and most expensive the most equity-oriented.)

“There is a laser focus on fees,” said Jake Gilliam, senior multi-asset class portfolio strategist at Charles Schwab Investment Management.

According to a report from the consulting firm Callan Associates, fees rank second only to portfolio construction in terms of the most important criteria for selecting or retaining TDFs.

Department of Labor fee-disclosure regulation issued in 2012, as well as a 2013 list published by the DOL that gives plan fiduciaries tips for TDF selection, which includes a review of fees and investment expenses, contribute to that laser focus, Mr. Gilliam said.

Further, litigation activity targeting plan sponsors for alleged excessive fees in their 401(k) plans has been particularly high over the last several months.

However, as Susan Shoemaker, partner at Plante Moran Financial Advisors, points out, selecting a TDF requires a much different due-diligence process from assessing an intermediate-term bond fund, for example, because of huge dispersion in the types of TDF.

Differences in glide path, stock-bond mix, and allocation to different underlying style categories (high-yield bonds or alternative asset classes, for example) make the funds unique.

While cost is important, advisers must weigh philosophical differences among plan-sponsor clients as well, perhaps selecting funds with a conservative glide path if downside risk at retirement is a big concern, for example, according to Ms. Shoemaker.

“I don't care if something is two basis points,” she said. “If something is way too aggressive or too conservative for the demographic, I won't use it.”

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

May 02

Conference

Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

UBS adviser count continues to decline

Firm to merge U.S., global wealth management units on Feb. 1

TD Ameritrade launches all-night trading for ETFs

Twelve funds now can be traded after-hours, but the list will grow, company says.

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

State measures to prevent elder financial abuse gaining steam

A growing number of states are looking to pass rules preventing exploitation of seniors.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print