Advisers reveal cyber insecurities at FPA conference

Most don't expect they could pass a hacking-preparedness test if the SEC came knocking, or even know all the compliance factors they are responsible for, according to a new Financial Planning Association study

Sep 16, 2016 @ 10:51 am

By Liz Skinner

Most financial advisers aren't confident they are well-armed to fight off cyberthieves, or even prepared enough to meet the requirements of the regulators policing their efforts.

Less than a third of advisers “completely agree” that they are 100% prepared to deal with the risks associated with cybersecurity, according to a new study by the Financial Planning Association, which released the data Friday at its annual conference in Baltimore.

Only 18% of advisers said they are “very confident” they would pass a Securities and Exchange Commission examination of their policies and actions on this issue today, with most not even sure they know what those SEC inspectors want from them.

“Advisers are aware of the risk associated with cybersecurity threats, but they're not fully confident in their ability to handle the challenges presented or even on how their firms should navigate a path forward,” said Dan Skiles, president of Shareholders Service Group and an FPA board member.

Advisers say cybersecurity is a top priority for their firm, recognizing the pain it can cause clients if personal information is stolen and used to create fraudulent identities, the survey of 1,015 planners, mostly registered investment advisers, found.

(More: Cybersecurity still worries RIAs the most: study)

The SEC issued cybersecurity guidance in April 2015 for advisers that recommends they design a strategy that helps to prevent, detect and respond to threats from hackers. It issued a reminder in its April 2016 rule proposal on business continuity plans.

Mr. Skiles suggested advisory firms need to up their cybersecurity preparation.

Two-thirds of advisers said they spent $5,000 or less in the past year — including some that spent nothing at all — developing or implementing cybersecurity policies and action plans, according to the FPA survey that was sponsored by TD Ameritrade Institutional.

“While advisers and their firms rightly see cybersecurity as a major threat to the industry, the response efforts are equivalent to a sprinter who's just popped out of the blocks,” Mr. Skiles said. “They know what the end-game is and where they're going, but they're just getting started and may encounter a number of hurdles along the way.”

Bryan Baas, TD Ameritrade Institutional's director of risk oversight and control, said advisers should be adopting industry best practices and a detailed security plan to protect clients and their firms.

“The reality is cyberfraud is pervasive and advisers cannot eliminate the threat, but they can reduce their risk,” he said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

INTV

Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

Gun violence hits investment strategies, sparks political debates with advisers

Screening out weapons companies has limited downside.

Whistleblower said to collect $30 million in JPMorgan case

The bank did not properly disclose that it was steering asset-management customers into investments that would be profitable for JPMorgan Chase.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

If Finra eases firm oversight of outside business activities, broker-dealers could lose revenue

Brokerage firms would no longer be able to charge reps for supervising nonaffiliated RIAs.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print