Here's why your clients probably didn't beat the S&P 500 in 2016

Expenses, overseas funds, bonds all bogged down performance. But what is the takeaway for investing in 2017?

Jan 3, 2017 @ 3:58 pm

By John Waggoner

Your clients had a great year in the stock market. But their first question might be, “Why didn't we get as much as the S&P 500?”

The Standard & Poor's 500 stock index gained 11.96% with dividends reinvested in 2016, despite a rough start: The blue-chip index fell 10.50% from the beginning of the year through February 11. But even with an all-stock portfolio, there were plenty of ways to underperform:

The growth lag. The average large-company blend fund, the closest to the S&P 500 in composition, gained 10.27%. The difference in performance can largely be chalked up to expenses. The average large-company growth fund, however, gained just 3.14% — a number that's popular in some circles, but probably not your clients'.

The overseas swoon. Adding international funds in 2015 meant that your clients lost money with a certain savoir faire. Doing the same in 2016 meant your clients lagged the S&P 500 with a bit more joie de vivre. But they still lagged, and badly: The average large-cap foreign blend fund gained just 0.67%, or slightly more than the average money market fund.

The bond bog. The yield on the bellwether 10-year Treasury note rose to 2.45% the end of 2016 from 2.27% at the end of 2015. (It had swooned to an all-time low of 1.34% in July). If investors were lucky, they got their interest payments, less expenses. For the typical intermediate-term bond fund, that translated into a 0.87% return.

The alt angst. No category in Morningstar's alternative subcategory gained more than an average 3.01%. (That would be multicurrency funds.) Managed futures funds lost an average 3.07%. Broad commodities, which are not part of the alternative subcategory, did rise 11.69%, aided by a rise in gold, the dollar and oil.

All three of these types of funds are common diversification fodder for advisers. Assuming you told investors you were trying to diversify and reduce volatility, you probably won't get much blowback. If any of these were supposed to be your secret sauce for outperformance, you probably won't get many compliments on your cooking.

But other categories fared spectacularly well. Small-cap value funds, for example, ended the year with a 25.80% gain. In fact, all value-oriented funds beat their growth and blend peers as energy and oil, perennial value playgrounds, rebounded.

And all wasn't wailing and gnashing of teeth overseas. Latin America funds soared 29.77%, and diversified emerging-markets funds gained 8.01%. Europe, wracked by Brexit fears, fell an average 2.09%, and China funds, clobbered by a sell-off at the start of the year, tumbled 2.32%.

Clients who took risks in the bond market were rewarded. High-yield bond funds outperformed the S&P 500, gaining 13.3% for the year, and emerging-markets bond funds added 9.99%, according to Morningstar.

Gold bugs shone in 2016. Funds that invest in the yellow metal itself hammered out an average 10.11% gain. But funds that invested in the stocks of gold mining companies soared 52.7%.

And among sectors, the worst of 2015 became the best. Energy funds gushed an average 29.23%, and energy MLP funds, snakebit in 2015, got up and danced last year with a 26.92% gain. Worst performers: Health-care funds, down 10.96%.

Is it better to invest in last year's laggard sectors, or its gainers? Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist for CFRA, suggests both. Buying the 10 worst sub-industries and the 10 best sub-industries has produced an annual average gain of 13.60% since 1991. Last year, the “barbell approach” gained 15.1%.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray with legislation requiring brokers to act in best interests of clients

Legislation requires brokers to act in the best interests of clients.

8 apps advisers love for getting stuff done

Smartphone apps that advisers are using in 2018 to run their business more efficiently.

Galvin's DOL fiduciary rule enforcement triggers industry plea for court decision

Plaintiffs warned the Fifth Circuit that Massachusetts' move against Scottrade signaled that the partially implemented regulation can raise costs for financial firms.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print