Younger investors most willing to pay for financial advice: Cerulli

While more investors overall are willing to pay for financial advice today, 79% of those aged 30 to 39 are interested in paying for financial help, according to a recent study

Jan 4, 2017 @ 12:24 pm

By Liz Skinner

More investors are willing to pay for financial advice today compared to nine years ago when the nation was on the cusp of an economic recession, and a surprising demographic is proving to be the most inclined.

About 50% of investors said they were interested in paying for financial advice when they were polled in late 2016, up from 40% in 2008, according to a report by Cerulli Associates issued on Wednesday. Those with the most money proved to be more likely to be willing to pay for help, the recent survey found.

But when it comes to age, unexpectedly, more of the younger cohorts were willing to invest in advice.

“Investors under age 40 express the greatest keenness to pay for financial advice,” said Scott Smith, director at Boston-based Cerulli Associates.

Specifically, 79% of investors aged 30 to 39 were interested in paying for financial help, the survey found. These households likely are having their first encounters with intimidating financial events such as home ownership, marriage and caring for children, the report said.

(More: XY Planning's Moore: Stop serving millennial clients 'Happy Meal' service)

About 73% of those under 30 said they were willing to pay for advice, compared to 54% of those 40 to 49, and about 44% of everyone 50 and older, the report found.

The results stand in contrast to the client demographics that the industry focuses on serving.

Most advisory firms seek out older clients because they have the greatest wealth and clients with low account balances tend not to provide enough revenue to run profitable businesses.

Many firms that do reach out to help younger investors offer cheaper digital platforms for investment and other planning guidance; however, that's not really what these investors want, the report from Cerulli said.

It would be more compelling for advisers to offer investors under 40 scalable, on-demand advisers from live advisers who can help investors with their challenging financial decisions, the report said.

(More: Must advisers manage money?)

“Digital options have become part of the landscape but consumers facing complex decision processes repeatedly choose to include humans in their service selections,” Mr. Smith said. “A belief in the trustworthiness and expertise of providers is a crucial element of these relationships.”

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Related stories

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

INTV

On the red carpet with Tom James and others at Icons & Innovators

Reflections from Jeffrey Gundlach, Edmund Walters and more at the New York City event

Latest news & opinion

Top 10 IBDs ranked by revenue

These independent broker dealers generated the most revenues in 2017.

8 podcasts advisers listen to when they aren't working

Listening to podcasts for the fun of it.

UBS continues to cut loans to recruits, while increasing compensation to brokers

The wirehouse reduced recruitment loans 20% and increased bonus loans 68% in the first quarter.

Things are looking up: IBDs soared in 2017

With revenue up, interest rates rising and regulation easing, IBDs are soaring.

SEC advice rule may give RIAs leg up over broker-dealers

Experts say advisers will be able to point to their role as fiduciaries as a differentiator in the advice market.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print