Subscribe

Robert W. Baird & Co. must pony up $23.5 million to Wells Fargo in raiding case

Size of award called "extraordinarily rare" by one securities attorney. (More: Brokerages walking away from arbitration awards)

A Finra arbitration panel awarded more than $23 million to Wells Fargo Advisors in case involving what the firm called a “raid” on a regional office by R.W. Baird & Co.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. arbitrators ruled that Baird must pay Wells Fargo $10.9 million in compensatory damages, $10.9 million in punitive damages, as well as $1.8 million in costs for a total of $23.5 million.
In addition, the Finra arbitrators held that individual members of Baird’s Wichita office must pay Wells Fargo compensatory damages, including Donald Barry ($542,632), Brian Docking ($161,314), Jill Docking ($181,112) and Kevin McWhorter ($114,942).
The award, signed last Friday, states that Wells’ cause of action “related to [Wells Fargo’s] allegation that [Robert W. Baird] raided its branch office in Wichita, Kan.” The arbitrators did not explain the reasoning for their decision.
Baird denied the allegations and filed a counterclaim against Wells Fargo asserting “breach of contract and unfair competition” as well as breach of Finra’s “Protocol for Broker Recruiting” and “attempting to stifle competition.”
Raiding cases are routine, but the size of the award surprised Andrew Stoltmann, a Chicago securities attorney.
“An eight-figure punitive damage award against a collectible firm is extraordinarily rare, and I’ve never seen a bigger one in a raiding case,” Mr. Stoltmann said. “It’s reasonable to assume that Baird and the individuals associated with it engaged in some likely egregious activity to get a Finra panel to whack them that hard.”
Baird disputed that it unfairly took advisers away from Wells Fargo.
“We strongly disagree with what is asserted in this situation and with the findings and are extremely disappointed in the size of the award,” said John Rumpf, a Baird spokesman. “In terms of potential impact on our financial results, we will have record revenues for 2016 year end and expect operating income in 2016 to be in line with 2015, which was a record year.”
Wells Fargo declined to comment.
In a June 15, 2015, announcement, Baird said that it established its Wichita office by adding 10 wealth management professionals, including six financial advisers “who were most recently with Wells Fargo Advisors” and brought $1.1 billion in assets with them.
Usually, raiding cases are settled before an arbitration panel rules, according to Mr. Stoltmann.
But Wells Fargo versus Baird was a knock-down, drag-out affair that encompassed 18 sessions between Dec. 12 and Jan. 6. The original claim was filed on Oct. 9, 2015.
Brokerages competing for adviser teams should take note of this case, according to Mr. Stoltmann.
“It’s a shot across the bow to brokerage firms to remind them to be careful when you’re taking a large number of brokers from one firm to their firm,” he said.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print