Justice Department continues to defend DOL fiduciary rule in court

Some experts anticipate the Trump administration will abandon the legal fight, but that hasn't happened yet

Feb 1, 2017 @ 1:19 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

The Department of Justice continues to defend a Labor Department investment-advice rule in a lawsuit in a Texas federal court almost two weeks after President Donald Trump was sworn into office.

In a Jan. 25 brief, financial industry plaintiffs asserted that a recent DOL proposal to ease compliance for some fixed-indexed annuities providers demonstrated that the advice rule would “upend” the distribution system and proved it was an example of “regulatory overreach.”

The industry also claimed that recent DOL guidance on the rule — which requires financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients in retirement accounts — “transforms virtually all sales activity into fiduciary advice.”

In a Jan. 30 reply, DOJ lawyers shot back.

“Plaintiffs' response … mischaracterizes the Department of Labor's rulemaking and guidance,” the brief states.

The lawsuit in the Texas court has been filed by several financial-industry trade associations, who claim that the rule is too complex and burdensome and will significantly increase the costs of giving and receiving advice.

The DOJ has been defending the DOL rule, which the Obama administration asserted is crucial for protecting workers and retirees from conflicted advice that leads to inappropriate high-fee investment products that erode savings.

Some experts anticipate the Trump administration will abandon the rule in court. But that hasn't happened yet.

“It's pretty rare for even a new administration to do a 180 [degree turn] with respect to its litigation posture,” said Micah Hauptman, financial services counsel at the Consumer Federation of America. “I understand that courts have not looked kindly on legal about-faces.”

One insurance industry association isn't surprised that the government is still backing the DOL rule.

"We would expect the Department of Labor, through the Justice Department, to continue to defend the rule unless or until instructed otherwise by the new administration," Gary Hughes, executive vice president and general counsel at the American Council of Life Insurers, said in a statement.

The judge presiding over the case in the Dallas federal court, Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn, could issue a ruling at any time.

“Victory in that lawsuit would prove the most efficient way to end the rule,” David Bellaire, executive vice president and general counsel at the Financial Services Institute, told reporters on Jan. 24 at the organization's annual meeting in San Francisco.

Industry opponents of the rule also are urging the Trump administration to delay and then repeal it.

For now, they're still fighting it out court.

In its Jan. 30 response, the DOJ said that the DOL guidance did not make the definition of fiduciary advice as expansive as the industry claimed.

“Even if the context makes a statement at [an investor] seminar a 'recommendation,' fiduciary obligations attach only if the other conditions are also met,” the DOJ response states.

It was signed by Galen N. Thorp, one of the DOJ attorneys, who, along with Emily Newton, has been defending industry lawsuits against the DOL rule since last summer.

The defendant in the Texas lawsuit has now been changed from former DOL Secretary Thomas Perez to the current acting secretary, Edward C. Hugler.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

The biggest drivers in wealth management today

What's shaping the future of financial advice? After 10 years of MarketCounsel Summits, Brian Hamburger explains what's changed in the past decade and what stands ahead for adviser technology and regulation.

Video Spotlight

Help Clients Be Prepared, Not Surprised

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

RIAs struggle to keep clients grounded amid stock market euphoria

With equities at record levels, financial advisers are confronted with realities of greed and fear.

Complexity of new indexed annuities causing concern

Insurers are using 'hybrid' indices as a way to differentiate themselves, but critics contend the products are less transparent, more confusing and don't add financial benefit.

Critics say regulation hasn't curbed overly rosy projections for indexed universal life insurance

They say rule didn't go far enough and more stringent measures may be necessary.

Broker, retirement groups make last-minute pleas to change tax legislation

Pass-through provisions are target of groups representing employee-model brokerage firms, as well as retirement plan advisers.

House and Senate reach tentative compromise for tax overhaul

Lawmakers still need to get a cost analysis of their agreement, so it's not yet definite, according to a source.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print