Editorial

President Trump's order on DOL fiduciary rule creates quandary for firms

Companies grapple over whether to continue adapting against backdrop of repeal or replacement

Feb 12, 2017 @ 12:01 am

President Donald J. Trump left the financial advice industry in no-man's land when he issued his directive to the Department of Labor to review its fiduciary rule, due to be implemented in April.

The regulation would require financial advisers to act in the best interests of clients when dealing with retirement accounts. Critics of the industry claim the current “suitability” standard for broker-advised retirement accounts costs clients too much in commissions and leaves them vulnerable to being sold investments that deliver more to the broker than the client. Supporters of the current standard argue that forcing all firms to act as fiduciaries will raise the cost of investment advice beyond the reach of those with small accounts.

Mr. Trump's directive leaves many firms in a quandary: Should they continue to change procedures to meet the requirements of the rule or halt those efforts in the hope it will be amended or even withdrawn?

Large firms with the resources, such as Merrill Lynch, have fully committed to adopting the fiduciary standard. Many smaller firms would like the rule to go away, or be delayed and modified.

DELAYED IMPLEMENTATION

Mr. Trump's directive instructed the DOL to prepare a new analysis to determine if the rule would make it more difficult for investors to get advice, disrupt the industry or cause an increase in litigation. Such an analysis would take several months.

The Labor Department is seeking a delay of the April 10 implementation deadline to conduct the review. If the agency finds harm, it can modify or replace the measure through a rulemaking process that also would take months, delaying implementation of any rule even further.

The best course for advisers would seem to be to continue with their current strategies. Those firms like Merrill Lynch that have decided to adjust to the rule should continue with that business model and hope they are correct. They have invested large amounts in systems to handle the new approach, and halting now would throw away that investment while the outcome is still unclear.

(Related read: The latest news and resources on the DOL fiduciary rule)

Those who decide to wait and see in hopes that the new administration, the Republican-controlled Congress or court challenges will kill the rule, should be prepared to move quickly to make changes to give fiduciary advice should it not die. Waiting seems the riskier approach, given the recent Texas court decision upholding the rule. At this point, the rule is effective.

Even if the reg does fall, the industry is likely to be confronted with a fiduciary rule eventually, if not from the DOL then from the SEC, which was given the authority by Dodd-Frank to promulgate such a rule. The SEC so far has dragged its heels in developing the rule, in part because it was engaged with other issues.

LITTLE MOVEMENT

Last May, the SEC's regulatory agenda said the agency hoped to propose its fiduciary rule by this April, though there has been little apparent movement toward developing the measure. No doubt the timetable has been thrown into disarray by the election result and the departure of SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White and two other commissioners.

(More: Outgoing SEC Chairman Mary Jo White hopes successor picks up fiduciary mantle)

The nominee to be the next SEC chairman, Jay Clayton, will be hard-pressed by Democrats in the Senate on his stance on the issue of the fiduciary rule during the hearings on his nomination. Since he is a Wall Street lawyer, Democrats are suspicious that he will be soft on the financial industry.

Meanwhile, there is anecdotal evidence customers are beginning to recognize the fiduciary issue for themselves. Several advisers at the TD Ameritrade Institutional conference two weeks ago, for example, mentioned to InvestmentNews staff that prospects they meet now ask them right off the bat if they are a fiduciary. One or two years ago, they were never asked that. Some also admitted that though they support the DOL rule, their businesses will benefit if it goes down and the distinction between their fiduciary standard and brokers' suitability standard remains.

Whatever the outcome of the DOL rule, all those who advise investors should be providing that advice based solely on the best interests of their clients. If all advisers had been doing so already, there would have been no need for a mandate in the first place.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

When can advisers expect an SEC fiduciary rule proposal and other regs this year?

Managing editor Christina Nelson and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss regulations of consequence to financial advisers in 2018, and their likely timing.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Fidelity charging new fee on Vanguard assets held in 401(k) plans

The 0.05% fee is ostensibly a response to Vanguard's distribution model, but may also make the company's funds less attractive due to higher cost.

UBS adviser count continues to decline

Firm to merge U.S., global wealth management units on Feb. 1

TD Ameritrade launches all-night trading for ETFs

Twelve funds now can be traded after-hours, but the list will grow, company says.

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print