Industry plaintiffs appeal Dallas court's decision to uphold DOL fiduciary rule

Opponents of rule seek to overturn loss in district court

Feb 24, 2017 @ 6:00 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Financial industry trade groups seeking to stop the DOL fiduciary rule are appealing a recent decision by a Dallas federal judge to uphold the measure.

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, the Financial Services Institute, the Insured Retirement Institute, the Financial Services Roundtable and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed the appeal on Friday in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

Earlier this month, the groups lost at the district court level when Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn of the Northern District of Texas granted summary judgment to the DOL. She shot down each of the industry's arguments against the rule, which included claims that DOL lacked authority to promulgate it, violated rulemaking parameters and created a new "private right of action" for clients to pursuing litigation against financial advisers.

But the plaintiffs say they can succeed at the appeals level.

"We remain confident in the merits and strength of our case and stand by our assertion that the Department of Labor exceeded its authority," the groups said in a joint statement. "We have long supported a best interest standard, adopted by the appropriate regulatory authority and across all individual investor accounts, not just retirement. This is a misguided rule that will harm retirement savers and financial services firms that provide needed assistance and options to their clients, including modest savers and small business employees. Further the 'private right of action' mechanism creates unwarranted litigation risk for financial advisers, who will face the threat of meritless class action lawsuits challenging their every move."

The appeal comes as the Trump administration has ordered DOL to reassess the rule and modify or rescind it if the agency finds that it causes harm to investors or firms. The directive echoes industry concerns that the rule is too complex and costly and will price investors with modest assets out of the advice market. Proponents of the rule argue that it is necessary to protect workers and retirees from conflicted advice that results in the purchase of inappropriate high-fee investments that erode savings.

The DOL is seeking a delay in the April 10 implementation date of the rule, which would require financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients in retirement accounts.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video


Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.

Legislation would make it harder for investors to sue mutual funds over high fees

A plaintiff would have to state in their initial complaint why fiduciary duty was breached, and then prove the violation with 'clear and convincing evidence.'

Relying on trainees, Merrill Lynch boosts adviser headcount in 2017

Questions remain about long-term effectiveness of wirehouse's move away from recruiting experienced brokers.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print