Outside-IN

Outside-INblog

Outside voices and views for advisers

Keep calm and carry on with both commissions and fees

Advisers must act in the best interest of clients and present them with all available retirement income offerings

Mar 15, 2017 @ 1:44 pm

By John Kennedy

Heightened transparency and education around the many financial products and services available in the marketplace today is critical in a client-adviser relationship, particularly surrounding changing consumer preferences for financial advice. The industry will continue to evolve, and as it does, advisers must escalate the importance of acting in the best interest of clients and present them with all available retirement income offerings. Regardless of regulatory changes, good advisers act in each client's best interest.

Saving for retirement is not as simple today as it was for previous generations. Demographic changes, and the fraying of corporate and government safety nets have had a profound impact on retirement income planning. With interest rates at historic lows and equity markets at all-time highs, the conditions that have allowed the most trusted strategies of the past to succeed are unlikely to be successful much longer. In fact, there is a 50% chance that retirees will outlive their savings. The annuity products available in today's financial marketplace offer guaranteed lifetime income that can help consumers achieve their retirement goals. It's up to the adviser to present these products to their clients to ensure they understand all available options, including how their adviser gets paid.

(More: J.P. Morgan moves ahead on dropping retirement commissions)

MAKING THE CASE FOR CHOICE

The Department of Labor's final rule acknowledged that both fee- and commission-based services can be in the client's best interest. Coupled with a thorough assessment of client needs and unbiased advice, both options offer benefits to clients. By listening to their needs, including past financial history and future goals and objectives, advisers can analyze a variety of potential paths for clients to take. In laying out options, clients are empowered to make their own decisions and determine what is right for them. Sharing objective information gives clients not only flexibility in options, but ultimately the choice to determine how they want to plan for their future.

As advisers help clients achieve their retirement income goals, there are certain factors to consider when determining which product or service is the right fit, and whether a fee- or commission-based arrangement is appropriate for each client.

DIFFERENT FINANCIAL NEEDS

Clients who anticipate more frequent portfolio changes may prefer a fee-based arrangement for consistent monitoring and oversight. In this manner, a flat rate or fixed percentage can help clients keep costs down, while receiving financial advice on a regular basis.

(More: How independent financial advisers can build practices that thrive regardless of DOL fiduciary rule outcome)

If clients see less need for ongoing portfolio changes, commission-based arrangements may be more suitable. In this model, clients receive advice primarily at the beginning of the process. Commission-based advice may be particularly appropriate for long-term, buy-and-hold investments like annuities. This level of guidance requires advisers to spend a significant amount of time educating clients about product selection and how it will contribute to their retirement income planning objectives.

BUILD TRUST

Clients place a great deal of trust in financial advisers, providing the industry with the opportunity to increase the level of client care by promoting transparent and open conversation.

By understanding a client's objectives for the future, advisers can present clients with a variety of choices and maintain transparency in discussions about their compensation models. To educate clients is to empower them to make an informed decision and build a client-adviser relationship underscored by trust.

(More: The Department of Labor's fiduciary rule: Where are we now?)

As consumer preferences and regulatory frameworks evolve, advisers have the opportunity to lead an open and transparent dialog about fee- and-commission-based retirement income services and prove how both act in clients' best interests. This not only reframes the conversation between clients and advisers; it also encompasses the broader perspective of overall client care.

John Kennedy is head of retirement solutions distribution for Lincoln Financial Distributors.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Does your pay stack up?

The Adviser Research Dashboard

Based on data collected through InvestmentNews' annual adviser research studies, this interactive, customizable tool allows you to view detailed data on compensation, staffing and financial performance practices from across the industry.

Learn more »

Upcoming Event

May 02

Conference

Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

Events

What's the first thing advisers should do when they get home from a conference?

After attending a financial services conference, advisers can be overwhelmed by options, choices and tools. What's the first thing they should do when they get back to their office?

Latest news & opinion

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray with legislation requiring brokers to act in best interests of clients

Legislation requires brokers to act in the best interests of clients.

8 apps advisers love for getting stuff done

Smartphone apps that advisers are using in 2018 to run their business more efficiently.

Galvin's DOL fiduciary rule enforcement triggers industry plea for court decision

Plaintiffs warned the Fifth Circuit that Massachusetts' move against Scottrade signaled that the partially implemented regulation can raise costs for financial firms.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print