Arizona broker-dealer settles charges it underwrote fraudulent muni bonds

Lawson Financial settles with SEC over due diligence in nursing home financings

Apr 6, 2017 @ 1:23 pm

By InvestmentNews

Lawson Financial Corp., a now-defunct municipal bond underwriter in Phoenix, Ariz., has settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission over charges related to muni bond offerings the firm underwrote that turned out to be fraudulent.

Also charged with failing to conduct reasonable due diligence were the firm's CEO, Robert Lawson, and then-underwriter's counsel John T. Lynch Jr., who also was charged with failing to disclose that he was not actually authorized to practice law, as represented to investors in bond offering documents.

In February, the Arizona Republic reported that Mr. Lawson settled with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. over similar charges, resulting in the firm withdrawing its Finra membership and being forced to close.

(More: Lower taxes could hit municipal bond yields)

The SEC's order found that Lawson Financial failed to conduct reasonable due diligence when underwriting bond offerings to purchase and renovate nursing homes and senior living facilities. The offerings were managed by Christopher F. Brogdon of Atlanta, who was later charged by the SEC with fraud and faces a court order to repay $85 million to investors.

The SEC charged that Lawson Financial failed to ensure that Mr. Brogdon and his related borrowers complied with their continuing disclosure undertakings, which generally prohibit underwriters from purchasing or selling municipal securities unless the issuer or obligated person has committed to providing continuing disclosure information, such as annual financial materials and operating data.

(More: Muni funds take on water as rates rise)

Mr. Lawson and his firm agreed to pay disgorgement of nearly $200,000, as well as penalties of nearly $200,000 for the firm and $80,000 for Mr. Lawson, who will be barred from the securities industry for three years. The firm and Mr. Lawson neither admitted nor denied the SEC's findings. Lawson Financial, which would have been eligible for more lenient remedies under the SEC's Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation Initiative, paid a penalty that was approximately double what the firm would have paid under the initiative, the SEC said in a release.

"Underwriters are critical gatekeepers relied upon by investors to ensure that accurate information is being provided in municipal bond offering documents," said Andrew M. Calamari, director of the SEC's New York Regional Office. "Lawson Financial failed to confirm that continuing disclosure obligations were being met by the Brogdon-controlled borrowers, allowing Mr. Brogdon's nursing home investment scheme to continue."


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

B-D Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' B-D Data Center to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Featured video


What type of adviser uses Betterment for Advisors?

Cara Reisman, director of Betterment for Advisors, says those who outsource investment management or want to serve small accounts and the next generation are common users of their robo-adviser.

Latest news & opinion

Why the super wealthy may want to fund life insurance with a loan

If the rate of return on the policy exceeds the loan's interest rate over the life of the contract, the client comes out ahead. But beware the risks.

New ways to pay for college

Experts respond to real-life scenarios of people struggling to afford higher education.

How technology is reshaping the advice business

Artificial intelligence, Amazon and robo-advisers are some of the topics on the minds of tech experts.

Best- and worst-performing sector funds and ETFs this year

A rising tide may lift all ships, but a bull market doesn't lift all stock sectors. Here are the best- and worst-performing sectors this year, with the top and bottom fund in each sector.

Betterment slapped with $400,000 fine from Finra

Robo-adviser cited for violating customer protection rule and not maintaining its books and records correctly.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print