Ric Edelman proposes Social Security fix: Allot $7,000 for each baby

Adviser's plan begins with the federal government setting aside money for each newborn baby for 35 years, to be invested for the child's retirement

Apr 19, 2017 @ 2:29 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

A prominent financial adviser is proposing to fix the Social Security system by using the same approach that he recommends to clients: Start saving early and take advantage of compound growth.

Ric Edelman, executive chairman of Edelman Financial Services, introduced a plan Wednesday in which the federal government would set aside $7,000 for each newborn baby for 35 years and invest the funds for the child's retirement. An investment board appointed by Congress and the president would make portfolio decisions. After the initial 35 years, the government would recoup its initial outlay and use the proceeds to reinvest for the next 35 years of births.

After 35 years, the average value of the investment for each child would be $93,000, based on an annual 7.68% return, according to Mr. Edelman. By the time child retires at 70, he or she would have $1 million, or an average monthly payout of about $1,341, which matches the current Social Security benefit.

His plan — which he calls Tomorrow's Retirement for the U.S. Today Fund for America, or the T.R.U.S.T. Fund for America — would cost the government a total of less than $1 trillion over 35 years, according to Mr. Edelman. At the same monthly benefit, he said it would cost $7,000 per worker instead of the more than $600,000 per worker now collected through Social Security taxes.

"It's a very simple, elegant solution simply based on the concept of compound growth," Mr. Edelman told reporters at the National Press Club in Washington. "The Social Security system in its current form is unsustainable. We need to consider innovative solutions."

The Social Security Trust Fund is expected to be depleted by 2033, which would require a cut of about a third in the monthly benefit. The average U.S. household has saved about $120,000 in retirement accounts and depends on Social Security for up to half of its retirement revenue, according to Mr. Edelman.

Reforming Social Security is a volatile topic. When lawmakers suggest cutting benefits or raising the retirement age, they are vulnerable to campaign attacks.

His plan would augment the current Social Security system rather than a replace it, Mr. Edelman said. Over time, maybe at the end of the first 35-year cycle, it might be adopted as an alternative. He said he has not yet tried to build political support for his idea.

Ric Edelman: Dramatic changes advisers don't see coming

"If this has any validity to it, people will respond to it and perhaps delve into viability, not just economic viability but, more importantly, political viability," Mr. Edelman said.

He touted the plan as offering something for both parties. For Democrats, it is not a threat to the current Social Security system. For Republicans, it's a "market-based solution."

"It is my hope that this will provide a new opportunity for conversation that has been lacking," Mr. Edelman said.

Mr. Edelman compared his plan favorably to Social Security reform offered last fall by the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington, which he said would cost $12.5 trillion in new taxes and benefit cuts.

But Shai Akabas, BPC director of fiscal policy, said the think tank's plan "achieves sustainable solvency" for Social Security, preventing automatic cuts for retirees and those nearing retirement and increasing benefits for low-income people.

"It was a permanent solution in the way it was scored by the chief actuary of the Social Security Administration," Mr. Akabas said.

How big an impact the TRUST Fund for America will have on the federal budget and how it would be integrated are the biggest obstacles its faces, according to Mr. Edelman. But he said the U.S. would collect $86 billion in tax revenue when retirement income is distributed.

"In 35 years, we should be able to eliminate the current Social Security system," Mr. Edelman said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Jul 10

Conference

Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

How did we pick this year's 40 under 40 winners?

Special projects editor Liz Skinner and editor Fred Gabriel say efforts to improve the financial advice industry and the promise of future success factored heavily in candidate selection.

Latest news & opinion

Merrill re-evaluates commission ban in retirement accounts

The wirehouse's wealth management group announces a fresh look at the ban now that the DOL rule is on the brink of death.

10 biggest retirement mistakes

Adhere to enrollment deadlines and distribution rules or pay a hefty penalty.

DOL fiduciary rule on brink of death as key deadline passes

Justice Department didn't petition the Supreme Court to rehear the case. A mandate from the 5th Circuit would finally lay the fiduciary rule to rest.

Finra to overhaul broker information system, cut compliance costs for broker-dealers

The move is intended to cut compliance costs for firms as well as make the registration and disclosure process more efficient.

SEC rule proposal doesn't include 401(k) sponsors in 'best interest' advice

Plan sponsors are left out of the equation because they don't appear to fall within the definition of "retail" investor, legal experts say.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print